Literature DB >> 12880805

Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback.

Filiep Debaere1, Nicole Wenderoth, Stefan Sunaert, Paul Van Hecke, Stephan P Swinnen.   

Abstract

It is commonly agreed that a functional dissociation with respect to the internal vs external control of movements exists for several brain regions. This has, however, only been tested in relation to the timing and preparation of motor responses, but not to ongoing movement control. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the present study addressed the neuroanatomical substrate of the internal-external control hypothesis by comparing regional brain activation for cyclical bimanual movements performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Subjects performed a bimanual movement pattern, either with the help of on-line visual feedback of the movements (externally guided coordination) or with the eyes closed on the basis of an internal representation of the movement pattern (internally generated coordination). Visual control and baseline rest conditions were also added. Results showed a clear functional dissociation within the network involved in movement coordination. The hMT/V5+, the superior parietal cortex, the premotor cortex, the thalamus, and cerebellar lobule VI showed higher activation levels when movements were guided by visual feedback. Conversely, the basal ganglia, the supplementary motor area, cingulate motor cortex, the inferior parietal, frontal operculum, and cerebellar lobule IV-V/dentate nucleus showed higher involvement when movements were internally generated. Consequently, the present findings suggest the existence of distinct cortico-cortical and subcortico-cortical neural pathways for externally (augmented feedback) and internally guided cyclical bimanual movements. This provides a neurophysiological account for the beneficial effect of providing augmented visual feedback to optimize movements in normal and motor disordered patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12880805     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00148-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  101 in total

Review 1.  Congenital mirror movements: a clue to understanding bimanual motor control.

Authors:  Cécile Galléa; Traian Popa; Ségolène Billot; Aurélie Méneret; Christel Depienne; Emmanuel Roze
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging metrics of the corpus callosum in relation to bimanual coordination: effect of task complexity and sensory feedback.

Authors:  Jolien Gooijers; Karen Caeyenberghs; Helene M Sisti; Monique Geurts; Marcus H Heitger; Alexander Leemans; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of patellar taping on brain activity during knee joint proprioception tests using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Callaghan; Shane McKie; Paul Richardson; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-01-26

5.  The "what" and "when" of self-initiated movements.

Authors:  Felix Hoffstaedter; Christian Grefkes; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of brain activity during the transition from visually guided to memory-guided force control.

Authors:  Cynthia Poon; Lisa G Chin-Cottongim; Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

8.  Dynamics of learning and transfer of muscular and spatial relative phase in bimanual coordination: evidence for abstract directional codes.

Authors:  J J Temprado; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intentional inhibition: how the "veto-area" exerts control.

Authors:  Simone Kühn; Patrick Haggard; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Optimizing the control of high-ID movements: rethinking the power of the visual display.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Stefan Panzer; Chaoyi Wang; Deanna Kennedy; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.