OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to determine the feasibility of a novel fractional flow reserve (FFR) algorithm based on coronary CT angiography (cCTA) that permits point-of-care assessment, without data transfer to core laboratories, for the evaluation of potentially ischemia-causing stenoses. METHODS: To obtain CT-based FFR, anatomical coronary information and ventricular mass extracted from cCTA datasets were integrated with haemodynamic parameters. CT-based FFR was assessed for 36 coronary artery stenoses in 28 patients in a blinded fashion and compared to catheter-based FFR. Haemodynamically relevant stenoses were defined by an invasive FFR ≤0.80. Time was measured for the processing of each cCTA dataset and CT-based FFR computation. Assessment of cCTA image quality was performed using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Mean total time for CT-based FFR determination was 51.9 ± 9.0 min. Per-vessel analysis for the identification of lesion-specific myocardial ischemia demonstrated good correlation (Pearson's product-moment r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) between the prototype CT-based FFR algorithm and invasive FFR. Subjective image quality analysis resulted in a median score of 4 (interquartile ranges, 3-4). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial data suggest that the CT-based FFR method for the detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses evaluated in the selected population correlates well with invasive FFR and renders time-efficient point-of-care assessment possible. KEY POINTS: • CT-based FFR computation is a promising novel non-invasive application. • A novel prototype algorithm permits time-efficient point-of-care CT-based FFR assessment. • Initial results of the CT-based FFR prototype algorithm compare favourably with FFR.
OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to determine the feasibility of a novel fractional flow reserve (FFR) algorithm based on coronary CT angiography (cCTA) that permits point-of-care assessment, without data transfer to core laboratories, for the evaluation of potentially ischemia-causing stenoses. METHODS: To obtain CT-based FFR, anatomical coronary information and ventricular mass extracted from cCTA datasets were integrated with haemodynamic parameters. CT-based FFR was assessed for 36 coronary artery stenoses in 28 patients in a blinded fashion and compared to catheter-based FFR. Haemodynamically relevant stenoses were defined by an invasive FFR ≤0.80. Time was measured for the processing of each cCTA dataset and CT-based FFR computation. Assessment of cCTA image quality was performed using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Mean total time for CT-based FFR determination was 51.9 ± 9.0 min. Per-vessel analysis for the identification of lesion-specific myocardial ischemia demonstrated good correlation (Pearson's product-moment r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) between the prototype CT-based FFR algorithm and invasive FFR. Subjective image quality analysis resulted in a median score of 4 (interquartile ranges, 3-4). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial data suggest that the CT-based FFR method for the detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses evaluated in the selected population correlates well with invasive FFR and renders time-efficient point-of-care assessment possible. KEY POINTS: • CT-based FFR computation is a promising novel non-invasive application. • A novel prototype algorithm permits time-efficient point-of-care CT-based FFR assessment. • Initial results of the CT-based FFR prototype algorithm compare favourably with FFR.
Authors: Arthur Nasis; Brian S Ko; Michael C Leung; Paul R Antonis; Dee Nandurkar; Dennis T Wong; Leo Kyi; James D Cameron; John M Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; Salvatore A Chiaramida; Philip Costello; Fabian Bamberg; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony DeFrance; Alexandra Lansky; Jonathan Leipsic; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Antonio Moscariello; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf; John W Nance; Peter L Zwerner; Mathias Meyer; Jacob C Townsend; Valerian Fernandes; Daniel H Steinberg; Christian Fink; Matthijs Oudkerk; Lorenzo Bonomo; Terrence X O'Brien; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: James K Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Michael J Pencina; Daniel S Berman; Bon-Kwon Koo; Carlos van Mieghem; Andrejs Erglis; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Patricia Apruzzese; Matthew J Budoff; Jason H Cole; Farouc A Jaffer; Martin B Leon; Jennifer Malpeso; G B John Mancini; Seung-Jung Park; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw; Laura Mauri Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Benedetta Enrico; Pal Suranyi; Christian Thilo; Lorenzo Bonomo; Philip Costello; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesco Secchi; Marco Alì; Elena Faggiano; Paola Maria Cannaò; Marco Fedele; Silvia Tresoldi; Giovanni Di Leo; Ferdinando Auricchio; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Eur Heart J Suppl Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Sara Seitun; Alberto Clemente; Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Giuseppe Runza; Massimo Midiri; Erica Maffei Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2017-04
Authors: M Renker; U J Schoepf; T Becher; N Krampulz; W Kim; A Rolf; H Möllmann; C W Hamm; T Henzler; M Borggrefe; I Akin; S Baumann Journal: Herz Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.747