Literature DB >> 22875799

Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease.

Antonio Moscariello1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, U Joseph Schoepf, John W Nance, Peter L Zwerner, Mathias Meyer, Jacob C Townsend, Valerian Fernandes, Daniel H Steinberg, Christian Fink, Matthijs Oudkerk, Lorenzo Bonomo, Terrence X O'Brien, Thomas Henzler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD)-specifically the ability of coronary CT angiography to help differentiate patients without and patients with a need for revascularization and determine the appropriate revascularization procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by institutional review board, with written informed consent from all patients. The study was conducted in compliance with HIPAA. One hundred eighty-five consecutive symptomatic patients (121 men; mean age, 59.4 years±9.7) with a positive single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion study underwent coronary CT angiography and conventional cardiac angiography (hereafter, cardiac catheterization). The management strategy (conservative treatment vs revascularization) and revascularization procedure (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] vs coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]) were prospectively selected on the basis of a combination of coronary CT angiography and SPECT. In addition, the authors calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of coronary CT angiography in the detection of obstructive CAD and the selection of a revascularization strategy. Cardiac catheterization was used as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Of the 185 patients, 113 (61%) did not undergo revascularization and 42 (23%) were free of CAD. In 178 patients (96%), the same therapeutic strategy (conservative treatment vs revascularization) was chosen on the basis of coronary CT angiography and catheterization. All patients in need of revascularization were identified with coronary CT angiography. When revascularization was indicated, the same procedure (PCI vs CABG) was chosen in 66 of 72 patients (92%).
CONCLUSION: In patients with high likelihood of CAD, the performance of coronary CT angiography in the differentiation of patients without and patients with a need for revascularization and the selection of a revascularization strategy was similar to that of cardiac catheterization; accordingly, coronary CT angiography has the potential to limit the number of patients without obstructive CAD who undergo cardiac catheterization and to inform decision making regarding revascularization. © RSNA, 2012

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875799     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT Perfusion and MR Perfusion Imaging in Comparison with Quantitative Coronary Angiography and SPECT-Multicenter Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Marcus Y Chen; Andrea L Vavere; Benjamin Kendziora; Julie M Miller; W Patricia Bandettini; Christopher Cox; Richard T George; João Lima; Marcelo Di Carli; Michail Plotkin; Elke Zimmermann; Michael Laule; Peter Schlattmann; Andrew E Arai; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm.

Authors:  Stefan Baumann; Rui Wang; U Joseph Schoepf; Daniel H Steinberg; James V Spearman; Richard R Bayer; Christian W Hamm; Matthias Renker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Li Qi; Jing Wang; Chun Xiang Tang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xue Man Ji; James V Spearman; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Tao Zhou; Ruijie Zhang; Lin Xu; Zhaohui Peng; Juan Ding; Sen Wang; Min Li; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Accuracy of computed tomography for selecting the revascularization method based on SYNTAX score II.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Jin Hur; Young Jin Kim; Hye-Jeong Lee; Yoo Jin Hong; Dong Jin Im; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software.

Authors:  James V Spearman; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Paul Apfaltrer; Justin R Silverman; Aleksander W Krazinski; Christian Canstein; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Philip Costello; Lucas L Geyer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Does Not Accurately Predict the Need of Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Stable Angina.

Authors:  Sung Jin Hong; Ae Young Her; Yongsung Suh; Hoyoun Won; Deok Kyu Cho; Yun Hyeong Cho; Young Won Yoon; Kyounghoon Lee; Woong Chol Kang; Yong Hoon Kim; Sang Wook Kim; Dong Ho Shin; Jung Sun Kim; Byeong Keuk Kim; Young Guk Ko; Byoung Wook Choi; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong Ki Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pradyumna Agasthi; Arun Kanmanthareddy; Charl Khalil; Obiora Egbuche; Vivek Yarlagadda; Rajesh Sachdeva; Reza Arsanjani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The diagnostic performance of coronary artery angiography with 64-MSCT and post 64-MSCT: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Li; Xiang-Min Du; Zhi-Tao Jin; Zhao-Hui Peng; Juan Ding; Li Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-Pitch Coronary CT Angiography at 70 kVp Adopting a Protocol of Low Injection Speed and Low Volume of Contrast Medium.

Authors:  Ruiqi Feng; Jiajie Tong; Xiaofei Liu; Yu Zhao; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.