Literature DB >> 22032711

Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.

Bon-Kwon Koo1, Andrejs Erglis, Joon-Hyung Doh, David V Daniels, Sanda Jegere, Hyo-Soo Kim, Allison Dunning, Tony DeFrance, Alexandra Lansky, Jonathan Leipsic, James K Min.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of a new method for quantifying fractional flow reserve (FFR) with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applied to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Measurement of FFR during invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard for identifying coronary artery lesions that cause ischemia and improves clinical decision-making for revascularization. Computation of FFR from CCTA data (FFR(CT)) provides a noninvasive method for identifying ischemia-causing stenosis; however, the diagnostic performance of this new method is unknown.
METHODS: Computation of FFR from CCTA data was performed on 159 vessels in 103 patients undergoing CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR. Independent core laboratories determined FFR(CT) and CAD stenosis severity by CCTA. Ischemia was defined by an FFR(CT) and FFR ≤0.80, and anatomically obstructive CAD was defined as a CCTA with stenosis ≥50%. Diagnostic performance of FFR(CT) and CCTA stenosis was assessed with invasive FFR as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients had ≥1 vessel with FFR ≤0.80. On a per-vessel basis, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 84.3%, 87.9%, 82.2%, 73.9%, 92.2%, respectively, for FFR(CT) and were 58.5%, 91.4%, 39.6%, 46.5%, 88.9%, respectively, for CCTA stenosis. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve was 0.90 for FFR(CT) and 0.75 for CCTA (p = 0.001). The FFR(CT) and FFR were well correlated (r = 0.717, p < 0.001) with a slight underestimation by FFR(CT) (0.022 ± 0.116, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive FFR derived from CCTA is a novel method with high diagnostic performance for the detection and exclusion of coronary lesions that cause ischemia.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032711     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  279 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Stress MPI, coronary CTA, and multimodality for subsequent risk analysis.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Computed tomography: The optimal imaging method for differentiation of ischemic vs non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Non-invasive functional assessment using computed tomography: when will they be ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Yeonyee E Yoon; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 8.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Current status of cardiac CT for the detection of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A Schuhbäck; M Marwan; R C Cury; S Achenbach
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.