Literature DB >> 25394862

Three-column osteotomies of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine: comparison of early outcomes, radiographic parameters, and peri-operative complications in 48 patients.

Alexander A Theologis1, Ehsan Tabaraee, Haruki Funao, Justin S Smith, Shane Burch, Bobby Tay, Khaled Kebaish, Vedat Deviren, Christopher Ames.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare early radiographic and clinical outcomes of lower cervical and upper thoracic three-column osteotomies (3CO) for cervicothoracic kyphosis correction.
METHODS: Patients who underwent 3CO at the cervicothoracic junction at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: lower cervical osteotomy (LCO) and upper thoracic osteotomy (UTO: T1-T5). Operative data, radiographic alignment, peri-operative complications, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients [male: 24; female: 24; average age 61 years (range 18-92 years); mean follow-up: 22 months] met inclusion criteria. A total of 24 pedicle subtraction osteotomies and 24 vertebral column resections were performed. Compared to UTO, LCO operative time was significantly shorter, average ICU and hospital stays were significantly longer, and the average pre-operative cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and kyphosis were significantly greater (p < 0.05). For both groups, there was significant improvement in cervical SVA, cervical lordosis, segmental angle, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SRS Activity, and pain visual analog score (p < 0.05). Reoperation rates were similar between the groups (LCO: 33.3 %; UTO: 18 %, p = 0.28). Significantly, more patients required tracheostomy/gastrostomy tubes after LCO (3 vs. 0 in the UTO group, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Three-column posterior osteotomies at the cervicothoracic junction restored regional sagittal alignment and improved quality of life in this series of patients with rigid cervicothoracic deformity, albeit with high complication rates. Lower cervical osteotomies provided greater cervical SVA correction and were shorter operations, although they were associated with more complications and longer hospital and ICU stays compared to upper thoracic osteotomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25394862     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3655-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Adam L Wollowick; Michael P Kelly; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Cervicothoracic junction kyphosis: surgical reconstruction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy and Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.

Authors:  Srinath Samudrala; Shoshanna Vaynman; Ty Thiayananthan; Samer Ghostine; Darren L Bergey; Neel Anand; Robert S Pashman; J Patrick Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12

5.  Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Jason M Babuska; Alex Ashton; Eric Busch; Cassandra Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason; Sigita Burneikiene
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Outcomes after surgery for cervical spine deformity: review of the literature.

Authors:  Arnold B Etame; Anthony C Wang; Khoi D Than; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  Management of cervical deformity in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Daniel J Hoh; Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders.

Authors:  Brian A Young; Michael J Walker; Joseph B Strunce; Robert E Boyles; Julie M Whitman; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Cervical kyphotic deformity correction using 360-degree reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric W Nottmeier; Hugh Gordon Deen; Naresh Patel; Barry Birch
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-08

10.  Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Richard D Ferch; Amjad Shad; Tom A D Cadoux-Hudson; Peter J Teddy
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  An in vitro evaluation of sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants.

Authors:  Donald J Blaskiewicz; Jeffrey E Harris; Patrick P Han; Alexander W Turner; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three-column osteotomy for correction of cervical and cervicothoracic deformities: alignment changes and early complications in a multicenter prospective series of 23 patients.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Justin K Scheer; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Peter Passias; Gregory Mundis; Robert Hart; Brian Neuman; Eric Klineberg; Richard Hostin; Shay Bess; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Fixed cervical high-grade kyphosis : Chin-on-chest deformity-Treatment plan].

Authors:  H Koller; S Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Correction of dropped head deformity through combined anterior and posterior osteotomies to restore horizontal gaze and improve sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Wesley H Bronson; Michael J Moses; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Single Level Proximal Thoracic Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Fixed Hyperkyphotic Deformity: Surgical Technique and Patient Series.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Bassel G Diebo; Louis Boissiere; Anouar Bourghli; Derek T Cawley; Daniel Larrieu; Vincent Pointillart; Vincent Challier; Jean Marc Vital; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.703

8.  Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing cervico-thoracic osteotomies for fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Silviu Sabou; Hossein Mehdian; Dritan Pasku; Luca Boriani; Nasir A Quraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Evaluating cervical deformity corrective surgery outcomes at 1-year using current patient-derived and functional measures: are they adequate?

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Samantha R Horn; Cheongeun Oh; Subaraman Ramchandran; Douglas C Burton; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Gregory W Poorman; Leah Steinmetz; Frank A Segreto; Cole A Bortz; Justin S Smith; Christopher Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Alexandra Soroceanu; Eric O Klineberg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

10.  3D printing-assisted preoperative plan of pedicle screw placement for middle-upper thoracic trauma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Xuming Zhang; Tie Ke; Hongru Cai; Xiang Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.