Literature DB >> 19652562

Cervical kyphotic deformity correction using 360-degree reconstruction.

Eric W Nottmeier1, Hugh Gordon Deen, Naresh Patel, Barry Birch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors report on their experience with cervical sagittal deformity correction using 360-degree reconstruction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A paucity of literature exists concerning 360-degree approaches for the correction of cervical kyphotic sagittal deformity in which the amount of deformity correction achieved, as well as the maintenance of deformity correction, is detailed.
METHODS: The charts of all patients undergoing 360-degree cervical reconstruction for kyphotic sagittal plane deformity between 2000 and 2006 at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included in this study; 41 patients fit this criterion. The clinical data were further analyzed in this cohort to determine preoperative and postoperative sagittal angle, loss of correction, fusion rate, complications, and clinical status at last follow-up.
RESULTS: Average follow-up was 19 months (range: 12 to 48 mo). The mean preoperative sagittal angle was 18 degrees of kyphosis (range: 3 to 58 degrees). The mean correction of sagittal angle was 22 degrees (range: 4 to 56 degrees), resulting in a postoperative mean sagittal angle of 4-degree lordosis. There was no loss of correction across the instrumented segments in any patient. Neurologic complications included 1 case of quadriparesis and 1 case of transient C8 radiculopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: The correction of cervical kyphotic sagittal plane deformity can be accomplished safely and effectively using a 360-degree approach. The incidence of major complications in this study was low. All patients could be corrected to a neutral or lordotic alignment. No loss of deformity correction was seen in any patient, and a 97.5% fusion rate was obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19652562     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318180e672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  18 in total

1.  Three-column osteotomies of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine: comparison of early outcomes, radiographic parameters, and peri-operative complications in 48 patients.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Ehsan Tabaraee; Haruki Funao; Justin S Smith; Shane Burch; Bobby Tay; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Normal sagittal profile of the cervical spine - must the cervical spine always be lordotic?]

Authors:  M Akbar; H Almansour; B Diebo; D Adler; W Pepke; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  An in vitro evaluation of sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants.

Authors:  Donald J Blaskiewicz; Jeffrey E Harris; Patrick P Han; Alexander W Turner; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Authors:  E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis.

Authors:  Ke Han; Chang Lu; Jing Li; Guang-Zhong Xiong; Bing Wang; Guo-Hua Lv; You-Wen Deng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pedicle Reduction Osteotomy in the Upper Cervical Spine: Technique, Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nicholas Post; Qais Naziri; Colin S Cooper; Robert Pivec; Carl B Paulino
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

9.  Five-level sub-axial cervical vertebrectomy and reconstruction: technical report.

Authors:  Adam Reig; Scott L Parker; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Evaluating cervical deformity corrective surgery outcomes at 1-year using current patient-derived and functional measures: are they adequate?

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Samantha R Horn; Cheongeun Oh; Subaraman Ramchandran; Douglas C Burton; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Gregory W Poorman; Leah Steinmetz; Frank A Segreto; Cole A Bortz; Justin S Smith; Christopher Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Alexandra Soroceanu; Eric O Klineberg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.