Literature DB >> 28361367

Three-column osteotomy for correction of cervical and cervicothoracic deformities: alignment changes and early complications in a multicenter prospective series of 23 patients.

Justin S Smith1, Christopher I Shaffrey2, Renaud Lafage3, Virginie Lafage3, Frank J Schwab3, Han Jo Kim3, Justin K Scheer4, Themistocles Protopsaltis5, Peter Passias5, Gregory Mundis6, Robert Hart7, Brian Neuman8, Eric Klineberg9, Richard Hostin10, Shay Bess5, Vedat Deviren11, Christopher P Ames12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three-column osteotomy (3CO), including pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column resection (VCR), can provide powerful alignment correction for adult cervical deformity (ACD). Our objective was to assess alignment changes and early complications associated with 3CO for ACD.
METHODS: ACD patients treated with 3CO with minimum 90-day follow-up were identified from a prospectively collected multicenter ACD database. Complications within 90-days of surgery and pre- and postoperative radiographs were collected.
RESULTS: All 23 ACD patients treated with 3CO (14 PSO/9 VCR) had minimum 90-day follow-up (mean age 62.3 years, previous cervical/cervicothoracic instrumentation in 52.2% and thoracic/thoracolumbar instrumentation in 47.8%). The primary diagnosis was kyphosis in 91.3% and coronal deformity in 8.7%. The mean number of fusion levels was 12 (range 6-18). The most common 3CO levels were T1 (39.1%), T2 (30.4%) and T3 (21.7%). Eighteen (12 major/6 minor) complications affected 13 (56.5%) patients. The most common complications were neurologic deficit (17.4%), wound infection (8.7%), distal junctional kyphosis (DJK 8.7%), and cardiorespiratory failure (8.7%). Three (13.0%) patients required re-operation within 90-days (1 each for nerve root motor deficit, DJK, and implant pain/prominence). Cervical alignment improved significantly following 3CO, including cervical lordosis (-2.8° to -12.9°, p = 0.036), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (64.6-42.3 mm, p < 0.001), and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (46.4°-27.0°, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among 23 ACD patients treated with 3CO, cervical alignment improved significantly following surgery. Thirteen (56.5%) patients had at least one complication. The most common complications were neurologic deficit, infection, DJK, and cardiorespiratory failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult; Cervical deformity; Kyphosis; Osteotomy; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28361367     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Osteotomy of the cervical spine; report of a case of ankylosing rheumatoid spondylitis.

Authors:  M R URIST
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Adam L Wollowick; Michael P Kelly; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies.

Authors:  S Champain; K Benchikh; A Nogier; C Mazel; J De Guise; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Surgery for kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  E H Simmons; M E Brown
Journal:  Can Nurse       Date:  1972-05

6.  Cervicothoracic junction kyphosis: surgical reconstruction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy and Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.

Authors:  Srinath Samudrala; Shoshanna Vaynman; Ty Thiayananthan; Samer Ghostine; Darren L Bergey; Neel Anand; Robert S Pashman; J Patrick Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12

7.  Cervical osteotomies for neurological deformities.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Venu M Nemani; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Surgical management of symptomatic cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Arnold B Etame; Khoi D Than; Anthony C Wang; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Jessica A Tang; Justin S Smith; Frank L Acosta; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Vedat Deviren; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-06-14

Review 10.  Complications and Outcomes for Surgical Approaches to Cervical Kyphosis.

Authors:  Matthew J Grosso; Roy Hwang; Ajit A Krishnaney; Thomas E Mroz; Edward C Benzel; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Vertebral subluxation during three-column osteotomy in surgical correction of adult spine deformity: incidence, risk factors, and complications.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Lingyan Xiao; Xu Sun; Benlong Shi; Zhen Liu; Leilei Xu; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior cervical osteotomy: operative technique.

Authors:  Lee A Tan; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Radiologic features of dropped head syndrome in the overall sagittal alignment of the spine.

Authors:  Kazuki Hashimoto; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Terumasa Ikeda; Masao Akagi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Full endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of the cervical spine: surgical technique and early experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Carr; Isaac Josh Abecassis; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

5.  Establishing consensus: determinants of high-risk and preventative strategies for neurological events in complex spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Michael G Vitale; Adam N Fano; Hiroko Matsumoto; Daniel J Sucato; Amer F Samdani; Justin S Smith; Munish C Gupta; Michael P Kelly; Han Jo Kim; Daniel M Sciubba; Samuel K Cho; David W Polly; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Peter D Angevine; Stephen J Lewis; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Risk-benefit assessment of major versus minor osteotomies for flexible and rigid cervical deformity correction.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Lara Passfall; Samantha R Horn; Katherine E Pierce; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton G Line; Gregory M Mundis; Robert Eastlack; Bassel G Diebo; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Han Jo Kim; Justin Scheer; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-09-08

8.  Neurological Complications and Recovery Rates of Patients With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgeries.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Yu-Cheng Yao; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Michael P Kelly; Munish Gupta; Todd J Albert; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Peter Passias; Eric Klineberg; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 9.  Pathological Features and Surgical Strategies of Cervical Deformity.

Authors:  Xiangyao Sun; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Wei Wang; Tongtong Zhang; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The impact of postoperative neurologic complications on recovery kinetics in cervical deformity surgery.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Avery E Brown; Haddy Alas; Katherine E Pierce; Cole A Bortz; Bassel Diebo; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Douglas C Burton; Robert Hart; Han Jo Kim; Shay Bess; Kevin Moattari; Rachel Joujon-Roche; Oscar Krol; Tyler Williamson; Peter Tretiakov; Bailey Imbo; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Christopher Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Robert Eastlack; Breton Line; Eric Klineberg; Justin Smith; Christopher Ames
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.