Donald J Blaskiewicz1, Jeffrey E Harris2, Patrick P Han3, Alexander W Turner2, Gregory M Mundis4. 1. Neurosurgical Medical Clinic, Inc., 8010 Frost St. Suite 414, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA. donald.blaskiewicz.md@gmail.com. 2. NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. 3. St. John Health System, Neuroscience Institute, Tulsa, OK, USA. 4. San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cervical spine malalignment can develop as a consequence of degenerative disc disease or following spinal surgery. When normal sagittal alignment of the spine is disrupted, further degeneration may occur adjacent to the deformity. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in lordosis and sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants. METHODS: Eight cadaveric cervical spines (Occiput-T1) were tested. The occiput was free to translate horizontally and vertically but constrained from angular rotation. The T1 vertebra was rigidly fixed with a T1 tilt of 23°. Implants with varying degrees of lordosis were inserted starting with single-level constructs (C5-C6), followed by two (C5-C7), and three-level (C4-C7) constructs. Changes in sagittal alignment, Occ-C2 angle, cervical lordosis (C2-7), and segmental lordosis were measured. RESULTS: Increasing cage lordosis led to global increases in cervical lordosis. As implanted segmental lordosis increased, the axial levels compensated by decreasing in lordosis to maintain horizontal gaze. An increase in cage lordosis also corresponded with larger changes in SVA. CONCLUSION: Reciprocal compensation was observed in the axial and sub-axial cervical spine, with the Occ-C2 segment undergoing the largest compensation. Adding more implant lordosis led to larger reciprocal changes and changes in SVA. Implants with supraphysiologic lordosis may allow for additional capabilities in correcting cervical sagittal plane deformity, following further clinical evaluation.
PURPOSE: Cervical spine malalignment can develop as a consequence of degenerative disc disease or following spinal surgery. When normal sagittal alignment of the spine is disrupted, further degeneration may occur adjacent to the deformity. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in lordosis and sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants. METHODS: Eight cadaveric cervical spines (Occiput-T1) were tested. The occiput was free to translate horizontally and vertically but constrained from angular rotation. The T1 vertebra was rigidly fixed with a T1 tilt of 23°. Implants with varying degrees of lordosis were inserted starting with single-level constructs (C5-C6), followed by two (C5-C7), and three-level (C4-C7) constructs. Changes in sagittal alignment, Occ-C2 angle, cervical lordosis (C2-7), and segmental lordosis were measured. RESULTS: Increasing cage lordosis led to global increases in cervical lordosis. As implanted segmental lordosis increased, the axial levels compensated by decreasing in lordosis to maintain horizontal gaze. An increase in cage lordosis also corresponded with larger changes in SVA. CONCLUSION: Reciprocal compensation was observed in the axial and sub-axial cervical spine, with the Occ-C2 segment undergoing the largest compensation. Adding more implant lordosis led to larger reciprocal changes and changes in SVA. Implants with supraphysiologic lordosis may allow for additional capabilities in correcting cervical sagittal plane deformity, following further clinical evaluation.
Authors: Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Avinash G Patwardhan; Robert M Havey; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi G Muriuki; Leonard I Voronov; Gerard Carandang; Ngoc-Lam Nguyen; Alexander J Ghanayem; Dale Schuit; Alpesh A Patel; Zachary A Smith; William Sears Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Matthew J Grosso; Roy Hwang; Ajit A Krishnaney; Thomas E Mroz; Edward C Benzel; Michael P Steinmetz Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2015-08
Authors: Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Ngoc-Lam Nguyen; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Muturi G Muriuki; Gerard Carandang; Zachary A Smith; William Sears; Laurie M Lomasney; Alexander J Ghanayem Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Rajiv Saigal; Gregory M Mundis; Robert Eastlack; Juan S Uribe; Frank M Phillips; Behrooz A Akbarnia Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.468