Literature DB >> 25391856

Unstable hip arthroplasties. A prospective cohort study on seventy dislocating hips followed up for four years.

Olle Wallner1, André Stark, Olle Muren, Thomas Eisler, Olof Sköldenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dislocating hip prosthesis remains a substantial clinical problem. The aim of this study is to describe the risk of recurrent instability after a primary dislocation of primary hip arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis (OA) or femoral neck fracture (FNF).
METHODS: Seventy patients (male/females: 25/45; mean age 77 [range 46-94]) with dislocating hip arthroplasties were included in a prospective cohort study and followed for four years. Radiographs and all surgical records were reviewed. We compared stable hips to those who either continued to dislocate or were revised due to recurrent instability (unstable group).
RESULTS: Forty-two hips (60 %) had episodes of recurrent instability leading to repeated closed reductions or major revision surgery and were classified as unstable. A diagnosis of FNF and cognitive dysfunction (OR 9.3 [95 % CI 1.4-64.1]) or postoperative radiological discrepancies such as leg-lengthening and offset reduction increased the risk of further instability (OR 13.5 [95 % CI 1.3-148.1]). The surgical approach at primary surgery and ASA class did not significantly influence the risk of continued instability.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a FNF and cognitive dysfunction or with sub-optimal postoperative radiographs after hip arthroplasty surgery are at high risk of recurrent instability after a primary dislocation. For hip fracture patients, all efforts should be made to avoid the first dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391856     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2583-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Stability of total hip arthroplasty in patients 75 years or older.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The dislocating hip: what to do, what to do.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Ramin Mehin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Toshinori Masaoka; Kengo Yamamoto; Takaaki Shishido; Yoichi Katori; Tatsuro Mizoue; Hideo Shirasu; Daisuke Nunoda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular augmentation ring for recurrent dislocation of total hip arthroplasty: 60% stability rate after an average follow-up of 74 months.

Authors:  B H Bosker; H B Ettema; C C P M Verheyen; R M Castelein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method.

Authors:  Martin Kjellberg; Erling Englund; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?

Authors:  Aaron H Carter; Eoin C Sheehan; S M Javad Mortazavi; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Oksana T Holubowycz; Robert Middleton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Failure of closed reduction after dislocation of Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors a 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Abraham O Odumala; Mohammed R Iqbal; Robert G Middleton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty for fractures is decreased with retentive cups.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Louis Ratte; François Roubineau; Jacques Pariat; Guillaume Mirouse; Isaac Guissou; Jerome Allain; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  11 in total

1.  A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marion Opperer; Yuo-yu Lee; Francisco Nally; Alvaro Blanes Perez; Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  WHAT causes dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty; a simple mnemonic for the orthopaedic resident.

Authors:  Geoff Crozier-Shaw; Paul Magill
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  No differences between direct anterior and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty related to muscle damage or functional outcome.

Authors:  Belén De Anta-Díaz; Juan Serralta-Gomis; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Eliana Benavidez; Fernando Anacleto López-Prats
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Dislocation and its recurrence after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kensei Yoshimoto; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takuaki Yamamoto; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Dislocation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.

Authors:  Sebastian Mukka; Jenny Lindqvist; Sara Peyda; Cyrus Brodén; Sarwar Mahmood; Hamid Hassany; Arkan Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?

Authors:  Dan-Viorel Nistor; Sergiu Caterev; Sorana-Daniela Bolboacă; Dan Cosma; Dan Osvald Gheorghe Lucaciu; Adrian Todor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Photobiomodulation guided healing in a sub-critical bone defect in calvarias of rats.

Authors:  Angela Maria Paiva Magri; Kelly Rossetti Fernandes; Hueliton Wilian Kido; Gabriela Sodano Fernandes; Stephanie de Souza Fermino; Paulo Roberto Gabbai-Armelin; Franscisco José Correa Braga; Cintia Pereira de Góes; José Lucas Dos Santos Prado; Renata Neves Granito; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  Reduced revision rate and maintained function after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures after transition from posterolateral to direct lateral approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Mukka; Björn Knutsson; Ammar Majeed; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  A Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison in FNF and OA Patients.

Authors:  Jakub Szczesiul; Marek Bielecki
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.