Literature DB >> 25557759

Dislocation of bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.

Sebastian Mukka1, Jenny Lindqvist, Sara Peyda, Cyrus Brodén, Sarwar Mahmood, Hamid Hassany, Arkan Sayed-Noor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze postoperative global femoral offset (FO), leg length discrepancy (LLD) and Wiberg angle as risk factors for prosthetic dislocation after treatment with bipolar hemiarthoplasty (HA) through a postero-lateral approach for femoral neck fracture (FNF).
METHODS: Three hundred and seventy three patients treated with a cemented bipolar HA through a postero-lateral approach between January 2006 and December 2013 were included in a cohort study with a follow-up time ranging from 6 months to 7 years. Radiographs and all surgical records were reviewed regarding Global FO, LLD and Wiberg angle. We compared stable hips without dislocation to those with either a single dislocation and those with recurrent instability.
RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty eight hips fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. The incidence of prosthetic dislocation was 10.7% (36/373). The mean time from surgery to first dislocation was 3.9 months (0-47) and 62.5% had recurrent dislocations. Patients with dislocation had a statistically significantly decreased postoperative global FO (-6.4 mm vs. -2.8 mm, p = 0.04), LLD (-2 vs. 1.5 mm, p = 0.03) and smaller Wiberg angle (40° vs. 46°, p = 0.01) on the operated side compared with the rest of cohort. In comparison to age and sex-matched control groups from the cohort, the difference in the radiographic parameters were significant in patients with recurrent dislocations but not in patients with a single dislocation.
CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent dislocations had a decreased postoperative global FO, shorter leg and shallower acetabulum on the operated side compared with their controls. These factors might decrease the soft-tissue tension around the operated hip and predispose to dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25557759     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2642-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  C L Barnes; D J Berry; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Dislocation of hip hemiarthroplasty following posterolateral surgical approach: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Mikko T Ovaska; Martti Soiva; Tero Vahlberg; Jussi Haapala
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Factors predisposing to dislocation of the Thompson hemiarthroplasty: 22 dislocations in 338 patients.

Authors:  Jarkko Pajarinen; Vesa Savolainen; Ilkka Tulikoura; Jan Lindahl; Eero Hirvensalo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-02

4.  Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur.

Authors:  N Blewitt; S Mortimore
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method.

Authors:  Martin Kjellberg; Erling Englund; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Anders Enocson; Carl Johan Hedbeck; Hans Törnkvist; Jan Tidermark; Lasse J Lapidus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Enhanced soft tissue repair using locking loop stitch after posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  C K Ko; S W Law; K H Chiu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  M B Petersen; H L Jørgensen; K Hansen; B R Duus
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Hip dislocation after modular unipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher C Ninh; Anil Sethi; Mohammed Hatahet; Clifford Les; Massimo Morandi; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Changes in implant choice and surgical technique for hemiarthroplasty. 21,346 procedures from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2005-2009.

Authors:  Olof Leonardsson; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm; Kristina Akesson; Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  15 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Risk Factors for Dislocation of Hip Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Through the Anterolateral Approach? A Nested Case-control Study.

Authors:  Eckart Mayr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Risk Factors Associated with Dislocation after Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Yeesuk Kim; Joon-Kuk Kim; Il-Han Joo; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

3.  What Are the Risk Factors for Dislocation of Hip Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Through the Anterolateral Approach? A Nested Case-control Study.

Authors:  Lianhua Li; Jixin Ren; Jia Liu; Hao Wang; Qinghua Sang; Zhi Liu; Tiansheng Sun
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Use of a Digital Protractor and a Spirit Level to Determine the Intraoperative Anteversion of Femoral Component during Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anuwat Pongkunakorn; Patanapong Palawong; Swist Chatmaitri; Nawakun Phetpangnga
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

5.  Risk Factors with Multilevel Evidence for Dislocation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures After Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Haifeng Liu; Yuanyuan Zhu; Lei Yan; Jiao Jiao Li; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Reduced revision rate and maintained function after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures after transition from posterolateral to direct lateral approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Mukka; Björn Knutsson; Ammar Majeed; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Techniques for the Management of Failed Surgery for Fractures of the Neck of Femur.

Authors:  Philip M Stott; Sunny Parikh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-10-31

8.  Wiring Techniques for the Fixation of Trochanteric Fragments during Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Clinical Study and Technical Note.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee; Yongsuk Cho; Junhyun Kim; Dong-Won Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-03-06

9.  Efficacy of Different Posterior Capsulotomies on Dislocations in Hip Hemiarthroplasty: T-Shaped Capsulotomy versus Longitudinal Capsulotomy.

Authors:  Ahmet Yilmaz
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Preprosthesis fracture of femoral and loosening of the femoral prosthesis during closed reduction of hip dislocation: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Qingye Qiu; Haifeng Lan; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.