Literature DB >> 23665654

The risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty for fractures is decreased with retentive cups.

Philippe Hernigou1, Louis Ratte, François Roubineau, Jacques Pariat, Guillaume Mirouse, Isaac Guissou, Jerome Allain, Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been efficacious for treating hip fractures in healthy older patients. However, in those patients with fractures a widely variable prevalence of dislocation has been reported, partly because of varying durations of follow up for this specific end-point. The purpose of the present study was to determine the cumulative risk of dislocation in these patients with fractures and to investigate if retentive cups decrease the risk of dislocation.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, 325 patients with neck fracture underwent primary THA using a retentive (325 hips) cup. The results of these 325 acetabular cups were compared to 180 THA without retentive cups performed for neck fractures in the same hospital between 1995 and 2000 by the same surgical team. The mean age of the 505 patients was 75 years (range 65-85). All patients were followed for a minimum of five years for radiographic evidence of implant failure. The patients were followed at routine intervals and were specifically queried about dislocation. The cumulative risk of dislocation and recurrent dislocation was calculated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: For patients without retentive cups, the cumulative risk of a first-time dislocation was 5 % at one month and 12 % at one year and then rose at a constant rate of approximately 1 % every year to 16 % at five years. For patients with retentive cups, the cumulative risk of a first-time dislocation was 1 % at one month, 2 % at one year and then did not changed at five years. There were no differences in the mortality rates or in loosening rates among the treatment groups. The rate of secondary surgery was highest in the group without retentive (10 % for recurrent dislocation) compared with 1 % in the group treated with retentive cups. In absence of retentive cups, multivariate analysis revealed that the relative risk of dislocation for female patients (as compared with male patients) was 2.1 and that the relative risk for patients who were 80 years old or more (as compared with those who were less than 80 years old) was 1.5. Two underlying diagnoses occurring during follow up-cognitively impaired patients or neurologic disease-were also associated with a significantly greater risk of dislocation in absence of retentive cup. For these patients the risk was also decreased with a retentive cup.
CONCLUSION: With standard cups the incidence of dislocation is highest in the first year after arthroplasty and then continues at a relatively constant rate for the life of the arthroplasty. Patients at highest risk are old female patients and those with a diagnosis of neurologic disease. Retentive cups in these patients are an effective technique to prevent post-operative hip dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665654      PMCID: PMC3685674          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1911-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

Review 1.  Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William Macaulay; Michael R Pagnotto; Richard Iorio; Michael A Mont; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Acetabular augmentation ring for recurrent dislocation of total hip arthroplasty: 60% stability rate after an average follow-up of 74 months.

Authors:  B H Bosker; H B Ettema; C C P M Verheyen; R M Castelein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Total hip replacement for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Long-term results.

Authors:  Sarūnas Tarasevicius; Viktoras Jermolajevas; Rimantas Tarasevicius; Vidmantas Zegunis; Alfredas Smailys; Romas Jonas Kalesinskas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years.

Authors:  Richard Blomfeldt; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer; Anita Söderqvist; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  R P Baker; B Squires; M F Gargan; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Constrained components for the unstable hip following total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  J T Williams; P S Ragland; S Clarke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients.

Authors:  J F Keating; A Grant; M Masson; N W Scott; J F Forbes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R M D Meek; D B Allan; G McPhillips; L Kerr; C R Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis in the treatment of unstable intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  A B van Vugt; W M Oosterwijk; R J Goris
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  10 in total

1.  Unstable hip arthroplasties. A prospective cohort study on seventy dislocating hips followed up for four years.

Authors:  Olle Wallner; André Stark; Olle Muren; Thomas Eisler; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Algimantas Cebatorius; Otto Robertsson; Justinas Stucinskas; Alfredas Smailys; Linas Leonas; Sarunas Tarasevicius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A novel navigation template for fixation of acetabular posterior column fractures with antegrade lag screws: design and application.

Authors:  Hongfen Chen; Gang Wang; Runguang Li; Yongjian Sun; Fuming Wang; Hui Zhao; Peijun Zhang; Xuanxuan Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The dual mobility cup in muscular skeletal oncology: rationale and indications.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Dario Attala; Alessandra Scotto di Uccio; Barbara Rossi; Gennaro Scotto; Roberto Biagini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  No dislocations after primary hip arthroplasty with the dual mobility cup in displaced femoral neck fracture in patients with dementia. A one-year follow-up in 20 patients.

Authors:  Anders Elneff Graversen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Pia Kjær Kristensen; Theis Muncholm Thillemann
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-02-10

8.  Major acetabular prosthetic protrusion following total hip arthroplasty: a case report of a reconstruction challenge.

Authors:  Marc Prod'homme; Gilles Dietrich; Lionel Helfer; Jonas Pierre Müller; Marc Barrera Uso; Didier Grasset; Geoffroi Lallemand
Journal:  AME Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-25

9.  Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach with a dual mobility cup for displaced femoral neck fracture in patients with a high risk of dislocation.

Authors:  Hironori Ochi; Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Mikio Matsumoto; Taiji Watari; Yu Ozaki; Hideo Kobayashi; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-10-06

10.  Has the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty performed for displaced femoral neck fracture improved with modern implants?

Authors:  Manish Noticewala; Taylor S Murtaugh; Jonathan Danoff; Gregory J Cunn; Roshan P Shah; Jeffrey Geller
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.