Literature DB >> 25361895

Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.

Annett Franke-Trieger1, Dirk Mürbe2.   

Abstract

Beside the cochlear size, the linear insertion depth (LID) influences the insertion depth angle of cochlear implant electrode arrays. For the specific implant CI422 the recommended LID is not fixed but can vary continuously between 20 and 25 mm. In the current study, the influence of cochlea size and LID on the final insertion depth angle was investigated to develop a prediction tool for the insertion depth angle by means of cochlea diameter and LID. Preoperative estimation of insertion depth angles might help surgeons avoid exceeding an intended insertion depth, especially with respect to low-frequency residual hearing preservation. Postoperative, high-resolution 3D-radiographs provided by Flat Panel Computed Volume Tomography (FPCT) were used to investigate the insertion depth angle in 37 CI422 recipients. Furthermore, the FPCT images were used to measure linear insertion depth and diameter of the basal turn of the cochlea. A considerable variation of measured insertion depth angles ranging from 306° to 579° was identified. The measured linear insertion depth ranged from -18.6 to 26.2 mm and correlated positively with the insertion depth angle. The cochlea diameter ranged from 8.11 to 10.42 mm and correlated negatively with the insertion depth angle. The results suggest that preoperatively measured cochlea diameter combined with the option of different array positions by means of LID may act as predictors for the final insertion depth angle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlea implant array; Cochlear size; Insertion depth angle; Linear insertion depth

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361895     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3352-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Annett Franke-Trieger; Claude Jolly; Alexander Darbinjan; Thomas Zahnert; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Elsa Erixon; Herman Högstorp; Karin Wadin; Helge Rask-Andersen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martinez-Monedero; John K Niparko; Nafi Aygun
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

7.  In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.

Authors:  Annett Trieger; Anja Schulze; Matthias Schneider; Thomas Zahnert; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jan Kiefer; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Stefan Pok; Silke Peters; Oliver Adunka
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preoperative prediction of angular insertion depth of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Mohammad M R Khan; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-03

2.  On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Marcel Kluge; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Kevin D Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kendall A Hutson; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Insertion Depth for Optimized Positioning of Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  Rueben A Banalagay; Robert F Labadie; Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Implementation of secondary reconstructions of flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and otological planning software for anatomically based cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff; Lukas Ilgen; Philipp Schendzielorz; Johannes Voelker; Johannes Taeger; Anja Kurz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilmann Neun; Kristen Rak
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.236

7.  Assessing the Placement of the Cochlear Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Array by Trans Impedance Matrix Analysis: A Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Diego Riol Sancho; Juan Carlos Falcón-González; Joana Pavone; Leandro Rodríguez Herrera; Silvia Borkoski Barreiro; Nadia Falcón Benitez; Ángel Ramos Macias
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Evaluation of the Relationship between the NRT-Ratio, Cochlear Anatomy, and Insertions Depth of Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; Grit Rademacher; Sven Mutze; Frederike Hassepass; Arneborg Ernst; Ingo Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.