Literature DB >> 29532169

On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

G Jakob Lexow1, Marcel Kluge2, Nils-Claudius Gellrich3, Thomas Lenarz2, Omid Majdani2, Thomas S Rau2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient specific selection of cochlear implants would benefit from pre-operative knowledge of cochlear length. Several methods for its measurement or estimation have been described in literature. This study focused on the achievable accuracy in clinically available imaging.
METHODS: Five simplified cochlea models milled into porcine bone were scanned in water using clinical cone beam computed tomography. Due to their well-known dimensions these phantoms served as gold standard for the length measurements. Each phantom was measured ten times using the custom software Comet. In addition, cochleae in ten image datasets taken indiscriminately from clinical routine were measured ten times each to test the precision under realistic conditions. The results were also compared to estimations based on the diameter of the basal turn (A value) as described in literature.
RESULTS: Measurement accuracy of the phantoms' lengths was high (average error: - 0.2 mm; standard deviation: 0.3 mm). The pooled standard deviation for the measurements in clinical datasets was 0.6 mm. Errors resulted mainly from problems locating the helicotrema. The estimations differed on average - 1.7 to + 0.4 mm from the manual measurements and had standard deviations between 0.5 and 0.6 mm depending on the algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: The program Comet was successfully used to accurately measure the length of the cochlea models in clinically available imaging. The lower image quality of patient scans reduced the precision of the measurement. Estimations using the A value are a quicker alternative for averagely sized cochleae in cases where the lack of accuracy is tolerable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; In-vitro verification; Midmodiolar view

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532169     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4930-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Three-dimensional geometric modeling of the cochlea using helico-spiral approximation.

Authors:  S K Yoo; G Wang; J T Rubinstein; M W Vannier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Constructing a three-dimensional electrical model of a living cochlear implant user's cochlea.

Authors:  T K Malherbe; T Hanekom; J J Hanekom
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martinez-Monedero; John K Niparko; Nafi Aygun
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length Computations Using Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Robert W Koch; Mai Elfarnawany; Ning Zhu; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma.

Authors:  Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006

6.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The Effect of Scala Tympani Morphology on Basilar Membrane Contact With a Straight Electrode Array: A Human Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Juul Verberne; Frank Risi; Luke Campbell; Scott Chambers; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Computed Tomography Estimation of Cochlear Duct Length Can Predict Full Insertion in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  James D A Johnston; Daniel Scoffings; Mark Chung; David Baguley; Neil P Donnelly; Patrick R Axon; Roger F Gray; James R Tysome
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cochlear Duct Length Measurements in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Newly Developed Techniques.

Authors:  Johannes Taeger; Franz Tassilo Müller-Graff; Lukas Ilgen; Phillip Schendzielorz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilman Neun; Kristen Rak
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-09-24

2.  Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  A Novel Method for Clinical Cochlear Duct Length Estimation toward Patient-Specific Cochlear Implant Selection.

Authors:  Daniel Schurzig; Max Eike Timm; Cornelia Batsoulis; Rolf Salcher; Daniel Sieber; Claude Jolly; Thomas Lenarz; Masoud Zoka-Assadi
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Characterization of the human helicotrema: implications for cochlear duct length and frequency mapping.

Authors:  Luke Helpard; Hao Li; Helge Rask-Andersen; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.