| Literature DB >> 25344286 |
Kyle Bittinger1, Emily S Charlson, Elizabeth Loy, David J Shirley, Andrew R Haas, Alice Laughlin, Yanjie Yi, Gary D Wu, James D Lewis, Ian Frank, Edward Cantu, Joshua M Diamond, Jason D Christie, Ronald G Collman, Frederic D Bushman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fungi are important pathogens but challenging to enumerate using next-generation sequencing because of low absolute abundance in many samples and high levels of fungal DNA from contaminating sources.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25344286 PMCID: PMC4232682 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0487-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Groups of subjects appearing in this study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 8 | HIV+ off ART, CD4 > 400 | 769 | Two scope | This study |
| 1B | 3 | HIV+ off ART, CD4 < 400 | 315 | Two scope | This study |
| 2B | 8 | HIV+ on ART, no lung disease | 674 | Two scope | This study |
| 3B | 6 | HIV-, no lung disease | Two scope | 16S data [ | |
| 3C | 4 | HIV-, no lung disease | None | This study | |
| 3D | 6a | HIV-, no lung disease | Single scope | This study | |
| Pulm | 13 | HIV-, mixed lung disease | Single scope | This study | |
| Transplant | 42 | Lung transplant recipients | Single scope | Time points with paired BAL and OW samples [ |
aFour subjects in group 3D were also sampled in group 3B. In each case, the group 3D sample was taken more than 1 year after the 3B sample (see Additional file 1 for details).
bSample sets Tx34B and Tx41B appear as Tx34 and Tx41, respectively, in Charlson 2012. The initial time points were not included in the previous publication because OW samples were not collected at the time of sampling.
Figure 1Proportional abundance of fungal genera in oropharyngeal wash, bronchoalveolar lavage, and contamination control samples. Many genera with high proportional abundance appear in only a few samples. For simplicity, only genera that were detected in 10 OW or 10 BAL samples are identified by name (full data in Additional file 2).
Figure 2Quantification of post-PCR ITS DNA is linear in the range of oropharyngeal, lung, and contamination control samples. (A) Two serial dilutions of a standard sample of S. cerevisiae showed a linear response between input and post-PCR PicoGreen-quantification in the range yielding 0 to 60 ng/μL of ITS product. (B) Serial dilutions of two oropharyngeal wash samples from lung transplant recipients also showed a linear response in this range. (C) Genomic DNA from S. cerevisiae spiked into an oropharyngeal wash sample resulted in a linear increase in total DNA concentration within the 0 to 60 ng/μL range, as measured by post-PCR PicoGreen quantification. (D) Although the total concentration of post-PCR ITS DNA differed between sample types, the median concentration of contamination control samples was about 10% of the concentration in oropharyngeal wash. The median concentration of lung samples was only a few times that of contamination controls.
Figure 3A global threshold for PicoGreen-corrected OTU abundance identifies genera in experimental samples that are extremely unlikely to arise from contamination sources. (A) Histogram of PicoGreen-corrected OTU abundances in control samples. The inset plot shows abundances above the 95% limit of the distribution, colored by contamination sample type. (B) Agreement between the PicoGreen-corrected abundance of fungi computed from ITS sequencing and clinical culture results in BAL samples. (C) ROC curve of post-PCR ITS abundance vs. culture results for all cultured fungi. The sequencing method is a good predictor of culture results (AUC = 0.93).
Figure 4Heatmap of fungal genera identified in a matched set of oropharyngeal and lung samples following curation by ITS abundance.
Figure 5Presence-absence analysis identifies fungal genera present more often in experimental samples relative to contamination controls. Aspergillus and Penicillium are present significantly more often in oropharyngeal and lung samples relative to controls, while Pichia and Saccharomyces are present more often only in OW relative to controls. Conversely, Wallemia likely derives solely from contamination sources.
Figure 6Bacterial covariation with in OW samples. (A) Principal coordinates analysis of weighted UniFrac distance between bacterial communities for oropharyngeal wash samples. Group centroids are shown with open triangles. The PicoGreen-corrected abundance of Candida has a significant effect on bacterial community composition (PERMANOVA P = 0.004, F = 3.8). (B) The QPCR-corrected abundance of Streptococcus, Rothia, and Veillonella increased with the abundance of Candida (Spearman correlation, P <0.05 after FDR correction). (C) Ten of the top 20 most abundant Streptococcus OTUs were found to increase with Candida abundance (Spearman correlation, P <0.05 after FDR correction).