| Literature DB >> 23018295 |
Cristina Areias1, Benedita Sampaio-Maia, Maria de Lurdes Pereira, Alvaro Azevedo, Paulo Melo, Casimiro Andrade, Crispian Scully.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although individuals with Down syndrome have considerable oral disease, the prevalence of dental caries in this group is low. The present study aimed to compare known risk factors for dental caries development in children with Down syndrome and a matched population (siblings). In both populations, the number of acidogenic microorganisms, such as mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and Candida species, and the paraffin-stimulated pH, flow rate and IgA concentration in whole saliva were evaluated and compared.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23018295 PMCID: PMC3438238 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(09)04
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Dietary habits in Down Syndrome (DS) and sibling control (C) children, namely regarding the frequency of acidic or sweet food ingestion.
| C | DS | ||
| How often did your children consume acidic foods between meals in the last several months? | 0.552 | ||
| Never or once a month | 25 (57%) | 21 (48%) | |
| Once a week | 18 (41%) | 20 (45%) | |
| Once a day or several times a day | 1 (2%) | 3 (7%) | |
| How often did your children consume sweet foods between meals in the last several months? | 0.218 | ||
| Never or once a month | 25 (57%) | 19 (43%) | |
| Once a week | 19 (43%) | 23 (52%) | |
| Once a day or several times a day | 0% | 2 (5%) |
Values are shown in absolute numbers (percentage). p-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test.
Figure 1The caries-free rates of Down syndrome (DS) children and sibling controls (C). The bars represent the means, and error bars represent the SDs. p-value was calculated using the chi-square test. *Values are significantly different between DS and sibling controls.
The total numbers of decayed, missing and filled primary (dmft) and permanent (DMFT) teeth in Down syndrome (DS) children and sibling controls (C).
| C | DS | ||
| Total | 1.84±3.13 | 1.02±2.42 | 0.167 |
| Decayed | 0.87±2.12 | 0.44±1.27 | 0.255 |
| Missing teeth | 0.04±0.21 | 0.16±0.67 | 0.293 |
| Filled teeth | 0.93±1.64 | 0.42±1.78 | 0.160 |
| DMFT | 1.42±2.11 | 0.71±1.79 | 0.080 |
| Decayed | 0.56±1.31 | 0.27±0.72 | 0.197 |
| Missing teeth | 0.04±0.21 | 0.11±0.44 | 0.359 |
| Filled teeth | 0.82±1.32 | 0.33±1.33 | 0.084 |
| dmft | 0.42±1.25 | 0.31±0.82 | 0.620 |
| Decayed | 0.31±0.92 | 0.18±0.61 | 0.423 |
| Missing teeth | 0 | 0.04±0.30 | 0.320 |
| Filled teeth | 0.11±0.61 | 0.09±0.47 | 0.847 |
Values are in means±SD.
The mutans streptococci, lactobacilli or Candida relative frequencies in saliva samples from Down syndrome (DS) children and sibling controls (C).
| C | DS | ||
| Mutans streptococci | 100% | 100% | 1.000 |
| Lactobacilli | 73.3% | 82.2% | 0.310 |
| 77.3% | 59.1% | 0.067 |
p-values were calculated using the chi-square test.
Figure 2Mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and Candida salivary levels in Down syndrome children and sibling controls. The bars represent the means, and error bars represent the SD. p-values were calculated using the Student's t-test. *Values are significantly different between DS and sibling controls.
The salivary pH, flow, and IgA concentration of Down syndrome (DS) children and sibling controls (C).
| C | DS | ||
| pH | 7.33±0.30 | 7.40±0.41 | 0.282 |
| Salivary flow, ml/min | 0.47±0.29 | 0.30±0.24 | 0.046* |
| IgA, mg/l | 83.2±36.4 | 79.5±42.2 | 0.677 |
| IgA secretion rate, μg/min | 40.1±39.1 | 28.5±24.9 | 0.125 |
The values shown are the means±SD. p-values were calculated using the Student's t-test. *Values are significantly different between DS and sibling controls.