RATIONALE: The etiology of sarcoidosis is unknown, but microbial agents are suspected as triggers. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify bacterial, fungal, or viral lineages in specimens from patients with sarcoidosis enriched relative to control subjects using metagenomic DNA sequencing. Because DNA from environmental contamination contributes disproportionately to samples with low authentic microbial content, we developed improved methods for filtering environmental contamination. METHODS: We analyzed specimens from subjects with sarcoidosis (n = 93), control subjects without sarcoidosis (n = 72), and various environmental controls (n = 150). Sarcoidosis specimens consisted of two independent sets of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lymph node biopsies, BAL, Kveim reagent, and fresh granulomatous spleen from a patient with sarcoidosis. All specimens were analyzed by bacterial 16S and fungal internal transcribed spacer ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. In addition, BAL was analyzed by shotgun sequencing of fractions enriched for viral particles, and Kveim and spleen were subjected to whole-genome shotgun sequencing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In one tissue set, fungi in the Cladosporiaceae family were enriched in sarcoidosis compared with nonsarcoidosis tissues; in the other tissue set, we detected enrichment of several bacterial lineages in sarcoidosis but not Cladosporiaceae. BAL showed limited enrichment of Aspergillus fungi. Several microbial lineages were detected in Kveim and spleen, including Cladosporium. No microbial lineage was enriched in more than one sample type after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Metagenomic sequencing revealed enrichment of microbes in single types of sarcoidosis samples but limited concordance across sample types. Statistical analysis accounting for environmental contamination was essential to avoiding false positives.
RATIONALE: The etiology of sarcoidosis is unknown, but microbial agents are suspected as triggers. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify bacterial, fungal, or viral lineages in specimens from patients with sarcoidosis enriched relative to control subjects using metagenomic DNA sequencing. Because DNA from environmental contamination contributes disproportionately to samples with low authentic microbial content, we developed improved methods for filtering environmental contamination. METHODS: We analyzed specimens from subjects with sarcoidosis (n = 93), control subjects without sarcoidosis (n = 72), and various environmental controls (n = 150). Sarcoidosis specimens consisted of two independent sets of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lymph node biopsies, BAL, Kveim reagent, and fresh granulomatous spleen from a patient with sarcoidosis. All specimens were analyzed by bacterial 16S and fungal internal transcribed spacer ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. In addition, BAL was analyzed by shotgun sequencing of fractions enriched for viral particles, and Kveim and spleen were subjected to whole-genome shotgun sequencing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In one tissue set, fungi in the Cladosporiaceae family were enriched in sarcoidosis compared with nonsarcoidosis tissues; in the other tissue set, we detected enrichment of several bacterial lineages in sarcoidosis but not Cladosporiaceae. BAL showed limited enrichment of Aspergillus fungi. Several microbial lineages were detected in Kveim and spleen, including Cladosporium. No microbial lineage was enriched in more than one sample type after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Metagenomic sequencing revealed enrichment of microbes in single types of sarcoidosis samples but limited concordance across sample types. Statistical analysis accounting for environmental contamination was essential to avoiding false positives.
Authors: Susannah J Salter; Michael J Cox; Elena M Turek; Szymon T Calus; William O Cookson; Miriam F Moffatt; Paul Turner; Julian Parkhill; Nicholas J Loman; Alan W Walker Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Wonder Puryear Drake; Zhiheng Pei; David T Pride; Robert D Collins; Timothy L Cover; Martin J Blaser Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Alexander L Greninger; Samia N Naccache; Scot Federman; Guixia Yu; Placide Mbala; Vanessa Bres; Doug Stryke; Jerome Bouquet; Sneha Somasekar; Jeffrey M Linnen; Roger Dodd; Prime Mulembakani; Bradley S Schneider; Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum; Susan L Stramer; Charles Y Chiu Journal: Genome Med Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Sarah Mollerup; Jens Friis-Nielsen; Lasse Vinner; Thomas Arn Hansen; Stine Raith Richter; Helena Fridholm; Jose Alejandro Romero Herrera; Ole Lund; Søren Brunak; Jose M G Izarzugaza; Tobias Mourier; Lars Peter Nielsen; Anders Johannes Hansen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Kristel S Knudsen; Sverre Lehmann; Rune Nielsen; Solveig Tangedal; Andreu Paytuvi-Gallart; Walter Sanseverino; Einar M H Martinsen; Pieter S Hiemstra; Tomas M Eagan Journal: Microbiome Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 16.837
Authors: Arwa A Abbas; Jacque C Young; Erik L Clarke; Joshua M Diamond; Ize Imai; Andrew R Haas; Edward Cantu; David J Lederer; Keith Meyer; Rita K Milewski; Kim M Olthoff; Abraham Shaked; Jason D Christie; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Arwa A Abbas; Louis J Taylor; Marisol I Dothard; Jacob S Leiby; Ayannah S Fitzgerald; Layla A Khatib; Ronald G Collman; Frederic D Bushman Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: John E McGinniss; Samantha A Whiteside; Aurea Simon-Soro; Joshua M Diamond; Jason D Christie; Fredrick D Bushman; Ronald G Collman Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 13.569