Literature DB >> 30560753

Molecular analysis of bacterial contamination on stethoscopes in an intensive care unit.

Vincent R Knecht1, John E McGinniss1, Hari M Shankar1, Erik L Clarke2, Brendan J Kelly3, Ize Imai1, Ayannah S Fitzgerald1, Kyle Bittinger4, Frederic D Bushman2, Ronald G Collman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Culture-based studies, which focus on individual organisms, have implicated stethoscopes as potential vectors of nosocomial bacterial transmission. However, the full bacterial communities that contaminate in-use stethoscopes have not been investigated.
METHODS: We used bacterial 16S rRNA gene deep-sequencing, analysis, and quantification to profile entire bacterial populations on stethoscopes in use in an intensive care unit (ICU), including practitioner stethoscopes, individual-use patient-room stethoscopes, and clean unused individual-use stethoscopes. Two additional sets of practitioner stethoscopes were sampled before and after cleaning using standardized or practitioner-preferred methods.
RESULTS: Bacterial contamination levels were highest on practitioner stethoscopes, followed by patient-room stethoscopes, whereas clean stethoscopes were indistinguishable from background controls. Bacterial communities on stethoscopes were complex, and community analysis by weighted UniFrac showed that physician and patient-room stethoscopes were indistinguishable and significantly different from clean stethoscopes and background controls. Genera relevant to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) were common on practitioner stethoscopes, among which Staphylococcus was ubiquitous and had the highest relative abundance (6.8%-14% of contaminating bacterial sequences). Other HAI-related genera were also widespread although lower in abundance. Cleaning of practitioner stethoscopes resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial contamination levels, but these levels reached those of clean stethoscopes in only a few cases with either standardized or practitioner-preferred methods, and bacterial community composition did not significantly change.
CONCLUSIONS: Stethoscopes used in an ICU carry bacterial DNA reflecting complex microbial communities that include nosocomially important taxa. Commonly used cleaning practices reduce contamination but are only partially successful at modifying or eliminating these communities.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30560753      PMCID: PMC6581638          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  23 in total

1.  Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans.

Authors:  Carles Ubeda; Ying Taur; Robert R Jenq; Michele J Equinda; Tammy Son; Miriam Samstein; Agnes Viale; Nicholas D Socci; Marcel R M van den Brink; Mini Kamboj; Eric G Pamer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes on the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A M Whittington; G Whitlow; D Hewson; C Thomas; S J Brett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.

Authors:  James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The third hand: low rates of stethoscope hygiene on general medical services.

Authors:  Ian Harold Jenkins; Bradley Monash; Jonathan Wu; Alpesh Amin
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Can education influence stethoscope hygiene?

Authors:  Jürgen L Holleck; Naseema Merchant; Shin Lin; Shaili Gupta
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Contamination of stethoscopes and physicians' hands after a physical examination.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Alexis Schneider; Clément Tschopp; Gesuèle Renzi; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Jacques Schrenzel; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota.

Authors:  Abigail P Lauder; Aoife M Roche; Scott Sherrill-Mix; Aubrey Bailey; Alice L Laughlin; Kyle Bittinger; Rita Leite; Michal A Elovitz; Samuel Parry; Frederic D Bushman
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 8.  Schrödinger's microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems.

Authors:  Joanne B Emerson; Rachel I Adams; Clarisse M Betancourt Román; Brandon Brooks; David A Coil; Katherine Dahlhausen; Holly H Ganz; Erica M Hartmann; Tiffany Hsu; Nicholas B Justice; Ivan G Paulino-Lima; Julia C Luongo; Despoina S Lymperopoulou; Cinta Gomez-Silvan; Brooke Rothschild-Mancinelli; Melike Balk; Curtis Huttenhower; Andreas Nocker; Parag Vaishampayan; Lynn J Rothschild
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Primer and platform effects on 16S rRNA tag sequencing.

Authors:  Julien Tremblay; Kanwar Singh; Alison Fern; Edward S Kirton; Shaomei He; Tanja Woyke; Janey Lee; Feng Chen; Jeffery L Dangl; Susannah G Tringe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.

Authors:  Fiona Fouhy; Adam G Clooney; Catherine Stanton; Marcus J Claesson; Paul D Cotter
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bacterial Contamination of Ultrasound and Stethoscope Surfaces in Low- and High-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Micah L A Heldeweg; Kenrick Berend; Laura Cadenau; Andert Rosingh; Ashley J Duits; Rosa van Mansfeld; Pieter R Tuinman
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.707

2.  Microbiological Impacts of Decontamination of Stethoscopes and Assessment of Disinfecting Practices among Physicians in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Survey.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid Tahir; Musharaf Zaman; Saad Babar; Fareeha Imran; Aasma Noveen Ajmal; Muna Malik; Jalees Khalid Khan; Irfan Ullah; Muhammad Sohaib Asghar
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.707

3.  Aseptic Stethoscope Barriers Prevent C difficile Transmission In Vitro.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Sarathi Kalra; Rajiv S Vasudevan; Francesca Torriani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-13

4.  Molecular analysis of the endobronchial stent microbial biofilm reveals bacterial communities that associate with stent material and frequent fungal constituents.

Authors:  John E McGinniss; Ize Imai; Aurea Simon-Soro; Melanie C Brown; Vincent R Knecht; Laura Frye; Priyanka M Ravindran; Marisol I Dothard; Dylan A Wadell; Michael B Sohn; Hongzhe Li; Jason D Christie; Joshua M Diamond; Andrew R Haas; Anthony R Lanfranco; David M DiBardino; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Aseptic Barriers Allow a Clean Contact for Contaminated Stethoscope Diaphragms.

Authors:  Rajiv Vasudevan; Ji H Shin; Jessica Chopyk; William F Peacock; Francesca J Torriani; Alan S Maisel; David T Pride
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-02-05

6.  New Scope for the Stethoscope.

Authors:  Sarathi Kalra; Sujan Reddy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-02-05

7.  Disinfection of Stethoscope and Non-Infrared Thermometer: Practices of Physicians in Ethiopia in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Biniyam Sahiledengle; Yohannes Tekalegn; Kebebe Bekele; Abdi Tesemma; Bruce John Edward Quisido
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-01-05

8.  Controversies on the Stethoscope During COVID-19: A Necessary Tool or an Unnecessary Evil?

Authors:  Love Patel; Darshan Gandhi; David Beddow
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.378

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.