Vincent R Knecht1, John E McGinniss1, Hari M Shankar1, Erik L Clarke2, Brendan J Kelly3, Ize Imai1, Ayannah S Fitzgerald1, Kyle Bittinger4, Frederic D Bushman2, Ronald G Collman1. 1. 1Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. 2Department of Microbiology,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. 3Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. 4Department of Pediatrics,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Culture-based studies, which focus on individual organisms, have implicated stethoscopes as potential vectors of nosocomial bacterial transmission. However, the full bacterial communities that contaminate in-use stethoscopes have not been investigated. METHODS: We used bacterial 16S rRNA gene deep-sequencing, analysis, and quantification to profile entire bacterial populations on stethoscopes in use in an intensive care unit (ICU), including practitioner stethoscopes, individual-use patient-room stethoscopes, and clean unused individual-use stethoscopes. Two additional sets of practitioner stethoscopes were sampled before and after cleaning using standardized or practitioner-preferred methods. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination levels were highest on practitioner stethoscopes, followed by patient-room stethoscopes, whereas clean stethoscopes were indistinguishable from background controls. Bacterial communities on stethoscopes were complex, and community analysis by weighted UniFrac showed that physician and patient-room stethoscopes were indistinguishable and significantly different from clean stethoscopes and background controls. Genera relevant to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) were common on practitioner stethoscopes, among which Staphylococcus was ubiquitous and had the highest relative abundance (6.8%-14% of contaminating bacterial sequences). Other HAI-related genera were also widespread although lower in abundance. Cleaning of practitioner stethoscopes resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial contamination levels, but these levels reached those of clean stethoscopes in only a few cases with either standardized or practitioner-preferred methods, and bacterial community composition did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Stethoscopes used in an ICU carry bacterial DNA reflecting complex microbial communities that include nosocomially important taxa. Commonly used cleaning practices reduce contamination but are only partially successful at modifying or eliminating these communities.
BACKGROUND: Culture-based studies, which focus on individual organisms, have implicated stethoscopes as potential vectors of nosocomial bacterial transmission. However, the full bacterial communities that contaminate in-use stethoscopes have not been investigated. METHODS: We used bacterial 16S rRNA gene deep-sequencing, analysis, and quantification to profile entire bacterial populations on stethoscopes in use in an intensive care unit (ICU), including practitioner stethoscopes, individual-use patient-room stethoscopes, and clean unused individual-use stethoscopes. Two additional sets of practitioner stethoscopes were sampled before and after cleaning using standardized or practitioner-preferred methods. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination levels were highest on practitioner stethoscopes, followed by patient-room stethoscopes, whereas clean stethoscopes were indistinguishable from background controls. Bacterial communities on stethoscopes were complex, and community analysis by weighted UniFrac showed that physician and patient-room stethoscopes were indistinguishable and significantly different from clean stethoscopes and background controls. Genera relevant to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) were common on practitioner stethoscopes, among which Staphylococcus was ubiquitous and had the highest relative abundance (6.8%-14% of contaminating bacterial sequences). Other HAI-related genera were also widespread although lower in abundance. Cleaning of practitioner stethoscopes resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial contamination levels, but these levels reached those of clean stethoscopes in only a few cases with either standardized or practitioner-preferred methods, and bacterial community composition did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: Stethoscopes used in an ICU carry bacterial DNA reflecting complex microbial communities that include nosocomially important taxa. Commonly used cleaning practices reduce contamination but are only partially successful at modifying or eliminating these communities.
Authors: Carles Ubeda; Ying Taur; Robert R Jenq; Michele J Equinda; Tammy Son; Miriam Samstein; Agnes Viale; Nicholas D Socci; Marcel R M van den Brink; Mini Kamboj; Eric G Pamer Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Abigail P Lauder; Aoife M Roche; Scott Sherrill-Mix; Aubrey Bailey; Alice L Laughlin; Kyle Bittinger; Rita Leite; Michal A Elovitz; Samuel Parry; Frederic D Bushman Journal: Microbiome Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Joanne B Emerson; Rachel I Adams; Clarisse M Betancourt Román; Brandon Brooks; David A Coil; Katherine Dahlhausen; Holly H Ganz; Erica M Hartmann; Tiffany Hsu; Nicholas B Justice; Ivan G Paulino-Lima; Julia C Luongo; Despoina S Lymperopoulou; Cinta Gomez-Silvan; Brooke Rothschild-Mancinelli; Melike Balk; Curtis Huttenhower; Andreas Nocker; Parag Vaishampayan; Lynn J Rothschild Journal: Microbiome Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Micah L A Heldeweg; Kenrick Berend; Laura Cadenau; Andert Rosingh; Ashley J Duits; Rosa van Mansfeld; Pieter R Tuinman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: John E McGinniss; Ize Imai; Aurea Simon-Soro; Melanie C Brown; Vincent R Knecht; Laura Frye; Priyanka M Ravindran; Marisol I Dothard; Dylan A Wadell; Michael B Sohn; Hongzhe Li; Jason D Christie; Joshua M Diamond; Andrew R Haas; Anthony R Lanfranco; David M DiBardino; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rajiv Vasudevan; Ji H Shin; Jessica Chopyk; William F Peacock; Francesca J Torriani; Alan S Maisel; David T Pride Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-02-05