Literature DB >> 25332254

Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Scott D Ramsey1, N Lynn Henry2, Julie R Gralow2, Dana K Mirick2, William Barlow2, Ruth Etzioni2, David Mummy2, Rahber Thariani2, David L Veenstra2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines discourage the use of tumor marker assessment for routine surveillance in nonmetastatic breast cancer, their use in practice is uncertain. Our objective was to determine use of tumor marker tests such as carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15-3/CA 27.29 and associated Medicare costs in early-stage breast cancer survivors.
METHODS: By using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare records for patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2001 and 2007, tumor marker usage within 2 years after diagnosis was identified by billing codes. Logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with use of tumor markers. To determine impact on costs of care, we used multivariable regression, controlling for other factors known to influence total medical costs.
RESULTS: We identified 39,650 eligible patients. Of these, 16,653 (42%) received at least one tumor marker assessment, averaging 5.7 tests over 2 years, with rates of use per person increasing over time. Factors significantly associated with use included age at diagnosis, diagnosis year, stage at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, geographic region, and urban/rural status. Rates of advanced imaging, but not biopsies, were significantly higher in the assessment group. Medical costs for patients who received at least one test were approximately 29% greater than costs for those who did not, adjusting for other factors.
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer tumor markers are frequently used among women with early-stage disease and are associated with an increase in both diagnostic procedures and total cost of care. A better understanding of factors driving the use of and the potential benefits and harms of surveillance-based tumor marker testing is needed.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25332254      PMCID: PMC4279234          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

1.  Measuring and predicting surgeons' practice styles for breast cancer treatment in older women.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; C D Berg; N J Meropol; S B Edge; K Gold; Y T Hwang; J Hadley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Jeannette Dowell; James E Herndon; Eric Winer; Nancy Stark; Jane C Weeks; Electra Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  R C Bast; P Ravdin; D F Hayes; S Bates; H Fritsche; J M Jessup; N Kemeny; G Y Locker; R G Mennel; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation.

Authors:  A Liberati
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Erin E Hahn; Ron D Hays; Katherine L Kahn; Mark S Litwin; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Determinants of the combined use of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for low-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ruben G W Quek; Viraj A Master; Kevin C Ward; Chun Chieh Lin; Katherine S Virgo; Kenneth M Portier; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up.

Authors:  M Rosselli Del Turco; D Palli; A Cariddi; S Ciatto; P Pacini; V Distante
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  20 in total

1.  Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Grace C Hillyer; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Analysis of blood markers for early breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  J Bayo; M A Castaño; F Rivera; F Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Association between survival time with metastatic breast cancer and aggressive end-of-life care.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Tal Gross; Grace C Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Jaffee; Chi Van Dang; David B Agus; Brian M Alexander; Kenneth C Anderson; Alan Ashworth; Anna D Barker; Roshan Bastani; Sangeeta Bhatia; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Otis Brawley; Atul J Butte; Daniel G Coit; Nancy E Davidson; Mark Davis; Ronald A DePinho; Robert B Diasio; Giulio Draetta; A Lindsay Frazier; Andrew Futreal; Sam S Gambhir; Patricia A Ganz; Levi Garraway; Stanton Gerson; Sumit Gupta; James Heath; Ruth I Hoffman; Cliff Hudis; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Ramy Ibrahim; Hossein Jadvar; Brian Kavanagh; Rick Kittles; Quynh-Thu Le; Scott M Lippman; David Mankoff; Elaine R Mardis; Deborah K Mayer; Kelly McMasters; Neal J Meropol; Beverly Mitchell; Peter Naredi; Dean Ornish; Timothy M Pawlik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Martin G Pomper; Derek Raghavan; Christine Ritchie; Sally W Schwarz; Richard Sullivan; Richard Wahl; Jedd D Wolchok; Sandra L Wong; Alfred Yung
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Serum Tumor Marker Use in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Ana Tergas; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman; Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Ana Tergas; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Adjuvant Treatment of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Offer the Best Chances of Cure.

Authors:  Spyridon Marinopoulos; Constantine Dimitrakakis; Andreas Kalampalikis; Flora Zagouri; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Alexandros Rodolakis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Assessing surveillance utilization and value in commercially insured patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kangho Suh; Veena Shankaran; Aasthaa Bansal
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.247

9.  Incidental radiologic findings at breast cancer diagnosis and likelihood of disease recurrence.

Authors:  Joel M Brothers; Kelley M Kidwell; Richard K J Brown; N Lynn Henry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.

Authors:  Lindsey Enewold; Helen Parsons; Lirong Zhao; David Bott; Donna R Rivera; Michael J Barrett; Beth A Virnig; Joan L Warren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.