Literature DB >> 15868443

Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804.

Martee L Hensley1, Jeannette Dowell, James E Herndon, Eric Winer, Nancy Stark, Jane C Weeks, Electra Paskett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 80% of women diagnosed with breast cancer will be survivors. We sought to determine the economic consequences of surviving breast cancer.
METHODS: Disease-free survivors who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer on CALGB study 8541 participated in a study of long-term outcomes. Survey responses were used to determine the types and frequency of medical resources used in follow-up, annual direct medical costs, and survivor perceptions of the personal economic impact of breast cancer.
RESULTS: 245 of 314 (78%) invited breast cancer survivors (median follow-up 12.2 years, range 9.3-16.4) completed the surveys. Eighty-seven percent reported having cancer specialist follow-up in the past year. The following percentages of survivors reported having had, for breast cancer follow-up, at least once in the past year: breast examination 92%, mammogram 88%, bone scan 18%, chest radiograph 59%, tumor marker studies 37%. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used at least according to published follow-up guidelines, or over-used. Median annual cost of follow-up per survivor was US 630 dollars (range US 0-10,817 dollars) with higher costs associated with medical oncology follow-up, lower income, and younger age. Few women reported a negative impact of breast cancer on employment, but 16% reported being denied life insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: Among long-term breast cancer survivors, patient self-report data suggest that over-use of medical resources for follow-up appears common. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used appropriately, or over-used. Costs of follow-up are higher with medical oncology follow-up, lower income and among younger survivors. The annual cost of follow-up varies widely and may be driven by over-use of follow-up tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868443     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-6497-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Priya R Patel; Judith S Jacobson; Ellen Warner; Daniel F Heitjan; Maxine Ashby-Thompson; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Dana K Mirick; William Barlow; Ruth Etzioni; David Mummy; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan D Campbell; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Is a comparative clinical trial for breast cancer tumor markers to monitor disease recurrence warranted? A value of information analysis.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; Norah Lynn Henry; Scott D Ramsey; David K Blough; Bill Barlow; Julie R Gralow; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.744

5.  Arm/hand swelling and perceived functioning among breast cancer survivors 12 years post-diagnosis: CALGB 79804.

Authors:  Jill M Oliveri; Jeannette M Day; Catherine M Alfano; James E Herndon; Mira L Katz; Marisa A Bittoni; Kathleen Donohue; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Cancer surveillance behaviors and psychosocial factors among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Cancer and Leukemia Group B 79804.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Kathleen A Donohue; Catherine M Alfano; Jeannette M Day; James E Herndon; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Promoting quality and evidence-based care in early-stage breast cancer follow-up.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Lynn N Henry; Daniel F Hayes; Scott D Ramsey; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; William E Barlow; Julie R Gralow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Employment and income losses among cancer survivors: Estimates from a national longitudinal survey of American families.

Authors:  Anna Zajacova; Jennifer B Dowd; Robert F Schoeni; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Hot flashes, fatigue, treatment exposures and work productivity in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jill E Lavigne; Jennifer J Griggs; Xin M Tu; Debra J Lerner
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in the context of multifactorial decision making to guide chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Michaela A Dinan; Kevin A Schulman; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.