Literature DB >> 8182811

Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the impact on survival and health-related quality of life of two follow-up protocols in patients with early breast cancer.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: Multicenter study involving 26 general hospitals in Italy. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 1320 women younger than 70 years with stage I, II, and III unilateral primary breast cancer. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to an intensive surveillance, which included physician visits and performance of bone scan, liver echography, chest roentgenography, and laboratory tests at predefined intervals (n = 655), or to a control regimen (n = 665), in which patients were seen by their physicians at the same frequency but only clinically indicated tests were performed. Both groups received a yearly mammogram aimed at detecting contralateral breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end points were overall survival and health-related quality of life.
RESULTS: Compliance to the two follow-up protocols was more than 80%. At a median follow-up of 71 months, no difference was apparent in overall survival with 132 deaths (20%) in the intensive group and 122 deaths (18%) in the control group. No significant differences were apparent in time to detection of recurrence between the two groups. Measurements of health-related quality of life (ie, overall health and quality-of-life perception, emotional well-being, body image, social functioning, symptoms, and satisfaction with care) at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up did not show differences by type of care received.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial support the view that a protocol of frequent laboratory tests and roentgenography after primary treatment for breast cancer does not improve survival or influence health-related quality of life. Routine use of these tests should be discouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8182811     DOI: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510440047031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  104 in total

Review 1.  [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].

Authors:  K Jensen; U Abel
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-09-15

2.  [Routine after-care 16 years after left adrenalectomy for adrenal cortex carcinoma. Late pulmonary metastasis of resected adrenal cortex carcinoma].

Authors:  M A Weber; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Tumour markers and FDG PET/CT for prediction of disease relapse in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Zora Baretta; Lorenzo Vinante; Anna Rita Cervino; Michele Gregianin; Cristina Ghiotto; Giorgio Saladini; Guido Sotti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; David C Hodgson; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Rahim Moineddin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Follow-up care for young adult survivors of cancer: lessons from pediatrics.

Authors:  Christine Eiser; Kate Absolom; Diana Greenfield; John Snowden; Robert Coleman; Barry Hancock; Helena Davies
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Quality of post-treatment surveillance of early stage breast cancer in Texas.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Gabriela M Vargas; Yimei Han; Celia Chao; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 9.  Current role of bone scan with phosphonates in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Maffioli; Luigia Florimonte; Luca Pagani; Ivana Butti; Isabel Roca
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Pulmonary Surveillance Strategies Following Sarcoma Excision Vary Among Orthopedic Oncologists: A Survey of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

Authors:  Zachary Ries; C Parker Gibbs; Mark T Scarborough; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.