Literature DB >> 26797222

Incidental radiologic findings at breast cancer diagnosis and likelihood of disease recurrence.

Joel M Brothers1, Kelley M Kidwell2, Richard K J Brown3, N Lynn Henry4.   

Abstract

Despite guidelines recommending against its routine use, perioperative imaging for distant metastases is frequently performed in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, uncovering incidental findings of uncertain significance. We assessed the clinical significance of incidental findings by determining if their presence is associated with disease recurrence. A retrospective review of staging imaging was performed in patients with stage II or III invasive breast cancer diagnosed during 2008-2009 at a large academic medical center. Data related to perioperative imaging and disease recurrence were abstracted from the medical record. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between incidental findings and time to disease recurrence. A total of 169 of 340 patients (49.7 %) underwent staging evaluation for distant metastases (CT chest, abdomen, pelvis, bone scan, and/or PET-CT). Of these, 146 (86.4 %) had at least one suspicious or indeterminate finding. Follow-up studies were performed in 73 (43.2 %) patients. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease at diagnosis, 18 of whom had stage III disease. In patients without metastatic disease at diagnosis, 32 later developed recurrence. Non-calcified pulmonary nodules were associated with shorter time to disease recurrence (hazard ratio 2.51, 95 % CI 1.13-5.57, p = 0.02). Imaging for distant metastases frequently reveals indeterminate findings, most of which are not associated with disease recurrence. The association between pulmonary nodules and recurrence warrants validation in an independent cohort. Overall, these findings support current guidelines recommending against routine extent of disease evaluation in patients with newly diagnosed stage II breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone Scan; Breast Cancer; CT; Incidental Findings; PET; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26797222      PMCID: PMC4734930          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3687-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  23 in total

1.  Are Physicians Choosing Wisely When Imaging for Distant Metastases in Women With Operable Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations.

Authors:  Aymer Al-Mutairi; Ashley N D Meyer; Paul Chang; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Newly diagnosed early breast cancer - an update on pre-operative assessment and staging.

Authors:  Meagan Brennan; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2012-11

5.  Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings.

Authors:  Sayon Dutta; William J Long; David F M Brown; Andrew T Reisner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Dana K Mirick; William Barlow; Ruth Etzioni; David Mummy; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting.

Authors:  James L Khatcheressian; Antonio C Wolff; Thomas J Smith; Eva Grunfeld; Hyman B Muss; Victor G Vogel; Francine Halberg; Mark R Somerfield; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The excessive cost of baseline diagnostic imaging in early breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Morris; M O'Connor; C O'Rafferty; R Sheikh; J Gray; R McDermott; T Boyle; M J Kennedy
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2009-05

9.  Perioperative screening for metastatic disease is not indicated in patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical signs of tumor spread.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Eva Seitz; Heiner Müller; Annette Krause; Toralf Reimer; Günther Kundt; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer.

Authors:  B Lee; A Lim; A Lalvani; M J L Descamps; R Leonard; S Nallamala; J S Lewis; R C Coombes; J Stebbing
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  3 in total

1.  PET-CT for Evaluating Breast Cancer Yields Incidental Finding in the Lung.

Authors:  Raquel Perez; Gladys Montane; Jill S Gluskin; Garth Nanni
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2019-11

2.  Clinical Significance of Radiologically Detected Small Indeterminate Extra-Mammary Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Rachel Yanlin Chen; Rui Ying Goh; Hoi Ting Leung; Stephanie Cheng; Veronique Kiak Mien Tan; Clement Luck Khng Chia; Jerry Tiong Thye Goo; Marc Weijie Ong
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Risk and prognostic factors of breast cancer with liver metastases.

Authors:  Lei Ji; Lei Cheng; Xiuzhi Zhu; Yu Gao; Lei Fan; Zhonghua Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.