Literature DB >> 24105101

Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Erin E Hahn1, Ron D Hays, Katherine L Kahn, Mark S Litwin, Patricia A Ganz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recently released a "Top Five" list of opportunities to improve the quality of cancer care. Item 4 on the list advises against using advanced imaging and biomarkers for surveillance in patients with breast cancer who are treated with curative intent. This study examined concordance with ASCO follow-up care guidelines for breast cancer survivors treated at an academic medical center.
METHODS: Claims data and medical records were reviewed and abstracted for early stage breast cancer survivors starting 1 year post diagnosis. A trained abstractor classified imaging tests as diagnostic or surveillance. Proportions and frequencies were generated for receipt of services. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with receiving recommended and nonrecommended services and biomarker tests.
RESULTS: Records were available for 258 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 58 years (standard deviation of 13 years), mean time since diagnosis was 6 years (standard deviation of 2 years), and 71% were stage 0/1. Only 47% of the sample received a mammogram within 1 year of diagnosis, and 55% of the sample received at least 1 nonrecommended imaging service for surveillance purposes. Seventy-seven percent of the sample received at least 1 nonrecommended biomarker test. Regression results indicate that main treating physician, advanced disease stage, younger age at diagnosis, and greater number of years since diagnosis were associated with receiving nonrecommended services for surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of nonrecommended services for surveillance occurs frequently among early-stage breast cancer survivors. There are opportunities to increase use of guideline concordant posttreatment care for breast cancer survivors.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; guideline adherence; health services; posttreatment care; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24105101      PMCID: PMC3855158          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Use of guideline recommended follow-up care in cancer survivors: routine or diagnostic indications?

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Christine Cole Johnson; Lois Lamerato; Laila M Poisson; Lonni Schultz; Jan Simpkins; Karen Wells; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Gary Chase; S David Nathanson; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The "top 5" lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

4.  Recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol DeSantis; Katherine Virgo; Kevin Stein; Angela Mariotto; Tenbroeck Smith; Dexter Cooper; Ted Gansler; Catherine Lerro; Stacey Fedewa; Chunchieh Lin; Corinne Leach; Rachel Spillers Cannady; Hyunsoon Cho; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Rebecca Kirch; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer.

Authors:  M P Rojas; E Telaro; A Russo; I Moschetti; L Coe; R Fossati; D Palli; Turco M del Roselli; A Liberati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  T J Smith; N E Davidson; D V Schapira; E Grunfeld; H B Muss; V G Vogel; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; William F Lawrence; Jennifer Cullen; Annette L Stanton; Janice L Krupnick; Lorna Kwan; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation.

Authors:  A Liberati
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  23 in total

1.  Quality of Posttreatment Care Among Breast Cancer Survivors in the University of California Athena Breast Health Network (Athena).

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Erin E Hahn; Laura Petersen; Michelle E Melisko; John P Pierce; Marlene Von Friederichs-Fitzwater; Karen T Lane; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Grace C Hillyer; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Trends in imaging after diagnosis of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Jaime L Wiebel; Mousumi Banerjee; Daniel G Muenz; Francis P Worden; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Temporal trends and regional variation in the utilization of low-value breast cancer care: has the Choosing Wisely campaign made a difference?

Authors:  Joan M Neuner; Ann B Nattinger; Tina Yen; Emily McGinley; Michael Nattinger; Liliana E Pezzin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Survivorship Care Plan Implementation in US Cancer Programs: a National Survey of Cancer Care Providers.

Authors:  Sarah A Birken; Sarah Raskin; Yuqing Zhang; Gema Lane; Alexandra Zizzi; Mandi Pratt-Chapman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders?

Authors:  Sarah A Birken; Robin Urquhart; Corrine Munoz-Plaza; Alexandra R Zizzi; Emily Haines; Angela Stover; Deborah K Mayer; Erin E Hahn
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Dana K Mirick; William Barlow; Ruth Etzioni; David Mummy; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Follow-up Reality for Breast Cancer Patients - Standardised Survey of Patients and Physicians and Analysis of Treatment Data.

Authors:  S Feiten; J Dünnebacke; V Friesenhahn; J Heymanns; H Köppler; R Meister; J Thomalla; C van Roye; D Wey; R Weide
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Imaging Radiation Doses and Associated Risks and Benefits in Subjects Participating in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fresco; Gonzalo Spera; Carlos Meyer; Pablo Cabral; John R Mackey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.