| Literature DB >> 25330259 |
Diogo M O Ogawa1, Shigeharu Moriya2, Yuuri Tsuboi3, Yasuhiro Date4, Álvaro R B Prieto-da-Silva5, Gandhi Rádis-Baptista6, Tetsuo Yamane7, Jun Kikuchi8.
Abstract
We propoEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25330259 PMCID: PMC4203823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic representation for the Biogeochemical Typing (BGC typing).
Yellow box: steps for collection and pre-processing the samples. Orange box: steps for data acquisition and formatting for BGC typing. Red box: steps for BGC typing as the integrated statistical analyses.
Figure 2Schematic representation for the sampling location.
Shadow map showing Kanto region (Japan). Grey area is Saitama prefecture. The rectangle indicates where the samples were taken. Magnified area is schematic map for the sampling site. At right side, schematic figure: Ara River was sampled in two points (ara1 and ara2) as well as paddy fields located within the area between these two river sampling points. Three independent paddy fields (paddy field 1, 2, 3) were selected and three samples were taken from each paddy field (p1f1-3, p2f1-3 and p3f1-3). These paddy fields were connected with Ara River through independent collector streams which were also sampled (p1s, p2s, p3s), respectively for each paddy field. Blue arrows indicate flow direction of Ara river and light brown arrows indicate each sampling points. Gaps in Ara River indicate bridges.
Figure 3Chemical profiles for the sampling points.
A) ICP-OES heatmap. X-axis: elements. Y-axis: sampling points. Red colour intensity corresponds to elemental concentration normalized by element. B) FT-IR spectra. X-axis: wavelength number. Y-axis: absorbance intensity. C) 1H-NMR spectra. X-axis: chemical shift. Y-axis: intensity.
Figure 4Finding the optimal number of BGC types.
X-axis: number of clusters. Y-axis: sum of squared distances from each variable to the centroid within the BGC type.
Figure 5Delimiting BGC types.
Plot of PCA scores for the extracted OTU matrix correlated with chemical profile. Four BGC types were delimited by k-means clustering. X-axis: PC1. Y-axis: PC2. BGC I: area enclosed in red with cross symbols, BGC II: area enclosed in blue with x symbols, BGC III: area enclosed in green with circular signals, BGC IV: area enclosed in pink with triangular signals. Arrows indicate the axes separating the BGC types; the quasi-horizontal arrow separates BGC III from BGC IV along the PC1 axis; the quasi-vertical arrow separates BGC I from BGC II along the PC2.
Figure 6Community distributions of the BGC types over the sampling points.
Distributions of relative abundances of communities identified as Archaea, 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA for the BGC types along the sampling points. X-axis: sampling points, Y-axis: relative abundance. Green shadows indicate sampling points on lentic waters and blue shadows indicate the sampling points over lotic waters. Below: a schematic drawing for the sampling points.
Figure 7Heatmap for the Spearman correlations of extracted OTUs against chemical profiles.
X-axis, in order: chemical elements (ICP-OES), wavelength number (FT-IR), chemical shifts (H-NMR). Y-axis: OTUs arranged from BGC type I (upper) to IV (bottom). BGC types are indicated on the left. The meaning of the colours is indicated in the legend at the bottom.
Figure 8Comparison of the average correlations for each BGC type against PCA loadings.
X-axis in order: chemical elements (ICP-OES), wavelength number (FT-IR), chemical shifts (H-NMR) (legend omitted). Y-axis: scaled scores. Average correlations from top to bottom are cluster 1 against PC2, cluster 2 against PC2, cluster 3 against PC1, and cluster 4 against PC1. Values are scaled by unity of variance.
Chemical profiles.
| BGC type I | BGC type II | BGC type III | BGC type IV | |
| ICP-OES | K | Si | Ba | |
| Mn | Cu | |||
| Ca | Fe | |||
| P | ||||
| Zn | ||||
| FT-IR | RC = O(1722–1647) | C-H (3037–2864) | ||
| C = C or C-H orRS = O (879–849) | O-H (3356–3055) | |||
| 1H-NMR | Phe (7.41, 7.39,7.37, 7.35, 7.33) | 7.94 | 7.96 | protein |
| Tyr 7.19 | 7.70 | 7.84 | formate 8.45 | |
| Ser (4.00, 3.94,3.83) | 7.56 | Phe 7.31 | ||
| lactate (4.12,4.10, 1.32, 1.30) | 7.04 | Ser (4.03, 3.92, 3.80) | ||
| Lys or Ala 3.72 | pyroglutamate (4.16, 2.50, 2.47, 2.44, 2.34, 2.09, 2.07, 2.04,2.02, 2.00) | |||
| Gly 3.55 | Ala or Lys 3.69 Lys (3.75, 3.09) | |||
| Lys (3.06, 3.04,3.01, 1.94) | Ala (3.67, 1.44) | |||
| pyroglutamate2.41 | Gly (3.58, 3.51) | |||
| Ala (1.49, 1.46) | ketone (1.59, 1.57) | |||
| 7.84 | amine or formaldehydel or methanol (3.38, 3.34) | |||
| 7.09 | Val (1.10, 1.08) | |||
| 6.65 | 8.08 7.94 7.91 7.87 7.817.79 7.56 | |||
| 7.22 7.07 7.04 7.02 4.08 4.06 3.90 | ||||
| 3.87 3.78 3.65 3.63 3.60 3.48 3.45 | ||||
| 3.42 3.40 3.32 3.28 3.26 3.22 3.20 | ||||
| 3.17 3.13 2.99 2.96 2.93 2.91 2.88 | ||||
| 2.85 2.81 2.77 2.75 2.69 2.67 2.64 | ||||
| 2.62 2.60 2.57 2.54 2.30 2.28 2.26 | ||||
| 2.22 2.20 2.16 2.12 1.89 1.86 1.84 | ||||
| 1.82 1.80 1.78 1.76 1.74 1.72 1.68 | ||||
| 1.66 1.64 1.62 1.53 1.51 1.41 1.39 | ||||
| 1.37 1.35 1.28 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.18 | ||||
| 1.16 1.13 0.92 0.89 0.87 0.84 0.82 | ||||
| 0.80 0.78 |
The chemical profile for the BGC types were divided by ICP-OES, FT-IR and 1H-NMR variables (omitted groups of variables are those with no high positive statistical dependence for the BGC type). Variables for ICP-OES are elements. Variables for FT-IR are the integrated area corresponding to the chemical bond in interval of wavelength (cm−1) showed in parentheses. Variables for 1H-NMR are the integrated area for the buckets (chemical shifts) in ppm; values in parentheses are chemical shifts assigned to the same compound or organic function.