| Literature DB >> 25329536 |
Marília Baierle1, Mariele F Charão2, Gabriela Göethel3, Anelise Barth4, Rafael Fracasso5, Guilherme Bubols6, Elisa Sauer7, Sarah C Campanharo8, Rafael C C Rocha9, Tatiana D Saint'Pierre10, Suelen Bordignon11, Murilo Zibetti12, Clarissa M Trentini13, Daiana S Avila14, Adriana Gioda15, Solange C Garcia16.
Abstract
Aging is often accompanied by cognitive impairments and influenced by oxidative status and chemical imbalances. Thus, this study was conducted to examine whether age-related cognitive deficit is associated with oxidative damage, especially with inhibition of the enzyme delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase (ALA-D), as well as to verify the influence of some metals in the enzyme activity and cognitive performance. Blood ALA-D activity, essential (Fe, Zn, Cu, Se) and non-essential metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, As, Cr, Ni, V) were measured in 50 elderly and 20 healthy young subjects. Cognitive function was assessed by tests from Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) battery and other. The elderly group presented decreased ALA-D activity compared to the young group. The index of ALA-D reactivation was similar to both study groups, but negatively associated with metals. The mean levels of essential metals were within the reference values, while the most toxic metals were above them in both groups. Cognitive function impairments were observed in elderly group and were associated with decreased ALA-D activity, with lower levels of Se and higher levels of toxic metals (Hg and V). Results suggest that the reduced ALA-D activity in elderly can be an additional factor involved in cognitive decline, since its inhibition throughout life could lead to accumulation of the neurotoxic compound ALA. Toxic metals were found to contribute to cognitive decline and also to influence ALA-D reactivation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25329536 PMCID: PMC4211010 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111010851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the study populations.
| Variable | Elderly | Young | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 20 | ||||
| Male/female | 19/31 | 8/12 | |||
| Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | ||
| Age (years) | 74.84 ± 1.22 b | 60–101 | 26.25 ± 0.82 | 25–35 | |
| Scolarity (years) | 7.67 ± 0.65 b | 0–18 | 16.90 ± 0.67 | 8–23 | |
| Hemoglobin (g·dL−1) | 13.25 ± 0.25 | 10.60–17.40 | 13.33 ± 0.34 | 11.20–15.90 | |
| ALA-D activity (U·L−1) | 31.93 ± 1.20 b | 14.19–62.01 | 42.05 ± 1.46 | 30.54–57.08 | |
| ALA-D activity with DTT (U·L−1) | 36.86 ± 1.22 b | 16.73–62.61 | 47.36 ± 1.43 | 32.76–58.26 | |
| ALA-D reactivation (%) | 16.39 ± 1.26 | 0.00–39.06 | 13.28 ± 2.37 | 1.09–41.69 | |
Notes: a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01 compared to young group; ALA-D: δ-Aminolevulinate dehydratase; DTT: dithiothreitol; Max: maximum; Min: minimum; SEM: standard error mean.
Cognitive performance under the different applied instruments in all studied groups.
| Instrument | Elderly ( | Young ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | |
| MMSE | 26.07 ± 0.62 a | 8–30 | 29.78 ± 2.06 | 27–30 |
| Word List Memory | 15.55 ± 0.62 | 0–24 | 20.30 ± 2.05 | 18–26 |
| Praxis Recall | 6.92 ± 0.47 a | 0–11 | 10.63 ± 1.44 | 8–11 |
| Time TMT A | 73.14 ± 7.25 | 29–300 | 39.19 ± 19.34 | 20–57 |
| Time TMT B | 156.38 ± 12.50 a | 5–311 | 85.94 ± 30.26 | 38–141 |
| Digit Span (WAIS III) | 10.78 ± 0.50 | 2–18 | 14.12 ± 1.66 | 9–22 |
Notes: a p < 0.05 compared to young group. The values were adjusted for scolarity; CERAD: Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease; Max: maximum; Min: minimum; MMSE: Mini-Mental Status Examination; SEM: standard error mean; TMT: Trial Making Test; WAIS III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Ed.
Regression models of the association between cognitive performance and ALA-D activity and reactivation index (n = 70).*
| Instrument a | ALA-D activity (U·L−1) | ALA-D reactivation index (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
| R2 |
| ||||
| MMSE | 0.420 | −0.050 | 0.672 | 0.442 | 0.160 | 0.122 | |
| Word List Memory | 0.640 | 0.001 | 0.995 | 0.642 | 0.038 | 0.634 | |
| Praxis Recall | 0.063 | 0.098 | 0.547 | 0.131 | −0.288 | 0.037 | |
| Time TMT A | 0.672 | −0.067 | 0.496 | 0.675 | 0.085 | 0.330 | |
| Time TMT B | 0.370 | −0.012 | 0.934 | 0.373 | 0.065 | 0.614 | |
| Digit Span (WAIS III) | 0.514 | 0.193 | 0.043 | 0.485 | 0.032 | 0.739 | |
Notes: * Analyses were adjusted for age, scolarity, gender and Pb levels; a Cognitive function entered into models as dependent variable; β: standardized coefficient beta; R2: determination coefficient; MMSE: Mini-Mental Status Examination; TMT: Trial Making Test; WAIS III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III Ed.
Metal levels in serum and whole blood of the studied subjects.
| Metals | Elderly | Young | LOD | Reference * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | Mean ± SEM | Min–Max | |||
| Fe | 1902.40 ± 121.29 | 840.0–4680.0 | 1857.00 ± 222.52 | 540.0–4180.0 | 108.00 | 800–1200 |
| Zn | 976.20 ± 34.13 | 590.0–1800.0 | 964.50 ± 74.37 | 470.0–1850.0 | 9.34 | 800–1100 |
| Cu | 1125.00 ± 28.15 | 650.0–1640.0 | 1263.00 ± 107.06 | 620.0–2190.0 | 2.45 | 800–1400 |
| Se | 116.20 ± 8.50 | 49.0–410.0 | 100.90 ± 5.02 | 65.0–140.0 | 8.20 | 75–120 |
| Pb | 62.06 ± 8.91 a | 12.0–280.0 | 41.90 ± 10.32 | 9.0–160.0 | 4.90 | 50–150 |
| Cd | 25.18 ± 19.58 | 0.9–180.0 | 8.52 ± 5.40 | 0.9–100.0 | 0.24 | 0.3–1.2 |
| Hg | 78.54 ± 49.14 | 2.0–480.0 | 57.30 ± 20.64 | 8.0–420.0 | 0.13 | 2.0–20.0 |
| As | 17.98 ± 1.05 | 8.0–38.0 | 16.20 ± 1.79 | 7.0–31.0 | 1.58 | 2.0–20.0 |
| Cr | 18.08 ± 1.60 | 7.0–63.0 | 19.88 ± 4.09 | 6.0–69.0 | 4.80 | <5.0 |
| Ni | 2.38 ± 0.23 | 0.9–9.0 | 2.15 ± 0.31 | 1.0–7.0 | 0.66 | 1.0–5.0 |
| V | 24.44 ± 2.38 | 6.0–63.0 | 22.80 ± 3.60 | 6.0–49.0 | 0.10 | 0.1–0.5 |
Notes: a p < 0.05 compared to young group. * World Health Organization (WHO); Essential metals were measured in serum and non-essential in whole blood; LOD: Limit of Detection; Max: maximum; Min: minimum; SEM: standard error mean.
Regression models between ALA-D activity and reactivation index versus metals (n = 70). *
| Metals (µg·L−1) | ALA-D activity (U·L−1) | ALA-D reactivation index (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | R2 | ||||||
| Fe | 0.222 | 0.102 | 0.371 | 0.136 | −0.350 | 0.005 | |
| Zn | 0.213 | −0.022 | 0.845 | 0.034 | −0.122 | 0.331 | |
| Cu | 0.218 | 0.085 | 0.514 | 0.043 | −0.179 | 0.216 | |
| Se | 0.227 | −0.128 | 0.273 | 0.082 | 0.266 | 0.411 | |
| Pb | 0.212 | 0.032 | 0.794 | 0.077 | −0.270 | 0.048 | |
| Cd | 0.213 | 0.010 | 0.930 | 0.029 | −0.102 | 0.416 | |
| Hg | 0.219 | 0.081 | 0.472 | 0.116 | −0.342 | 0.010 | |
| As | 0.274 | 0.265 | 0.223 | 0.259 | −0.523 | 0.001 | |
| Cr | 0.282 | 0.270 | 0.116 | 0.256 | −0.499 | 0.001 | |
| Ni | 0.229 | 0.149 | 0.197 | 0.109 | −0.321 | 0.011 | |
| V | 0.289 | 0.291 | 0.111 | 0.336 | −0.594 | 0.001 | |
Notes: * Analyses were adjusted for age, scolarity and gender; β: standardized coefficient beta; R2: determination coefficient