Literature DB >> 23696422

Views and preferences for the implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the United Kingdom.

Melissa Hill1, Madhavi Karunaratna, Celine Lewis, Frida Forya, Lyn Chitty.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) will offer new options in prenatal diagnosis for carriers of single gene disorders. This will affect carrier couples and health professionals involved in prenatal care. The aim of this study was to determine health professional opinions on NIPD for single gene disorders to guide development of infrastructure required for implementation. A qualitative approach was adopted using focus groups (N = 17) and one-to-one interviews (N = 30) with health professionals from a range of backgrounds involved in caring for carriers of single gene disorders. Data were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants were very positive about the introduction of NIPD, describing benefits arising from no risk of miscarriage, earlier testing and a simple procedure. A number of concerns for implementation were raised. Participants emphasized the need for the new test to be highly accurate and thoroughly validated. There was concern that people may not give as much thought to having a blood test compared to an invasive test or that it may be viewed as routine and as such NIPD may negatively impact on informed consent. In addition there was concern that the simplicity of a blood test may lead to increased pressure to test and terminate. However, participants felt these concerns could be overcome with thorough pre- and post-test counseling. To ensure high quality care, offering NIPD through genetics or other specialist services is essential. Ongoing education and training of health professionals will be important, and guidelines and regulation are needed for effective implementation.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696422     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  16 in total

1.  "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Rosemary J Steinbach; Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie; Emily Y Liu; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Old Questions, New Paradigms: Ethical, Legal, and Social Complications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Megan Allyse
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  CUGC for syndromic microphthalmia including next-generation sequencing-based approaches.

Authors:  Jonathan Eintracht; Marta Corton; David FitzPatrick; Mariya Moosajee
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for BRCA Mutations - a Qualitative Pilot Study of Health Professionals' Views.

Authors:  Jade Bennett; Lyn Chitty; Celine Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  An easy test but a hard decision: ethical issues concerning non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive disorders.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Client views and attitudes to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for sickle cell disease, thalassaemia and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Cecilia Compton; Madhavi Karunaratna; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Structural Malformations.

Authors:  Fiona L Mackie; Keren J Carss; Sarah C Hillman; Matthew E Hurles; Mark D Kilby
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next-generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate, and comprehensive approach.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Sarah Mason; Angela N Barrett; Fiona McKay; Nicholas Lench; Rebecca Daley; Lucy A Jenkins
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Preferences for Prenatal Tests for Cystic Fibrosis: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Compare the Views of Adult Patients, Carriers of Cystic Fibrosis and Health Professionals.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Ranjan Suri; Edward F Nash; Stephen Morris; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.