Literature DB >> 27830353

Genetic Counseling for Couples Seeking Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Japan: Experiences of Pregnant Women and their Partners.

Motoko Watanabe1,2, Mari Matsuo1, Masaki Ogawa3, Toshitaka Uchiyama1, Satoru Shimizu4, Naoko Iwasaki1,5, Akemi Yamauchi1, Mari Urano1, Hironao Numabe2, Kayoko Saito6.   

Abstract

The recent advent of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has had a significant impact in the field of prenatal testing. Although reports on pregnant women who used NIPT have accumulated, little is known about the experiences of their male partners. In this study, we assessed the experiences of couples who were expecting a child and undergoing NIPT, with a focus on both the pregnant women and their partners. Questionnaires were administered to 282 participants focusing on their specific experiences at three time points: after pre-test counseling (first visit), when undergoing NIPT (second visit), and when results were received (third visit). Responses were analyzed to assess the differences between pregnant women and their partners. We found that more partners selected "family" as their first information source about NIPT and "my partner" as the first person to request NIPT than did pregnant women (35.6 vs. 5.9 %; p < 0.001 and 19.3 vs.1.5 %; p < 0.001). However, pregnant women more often consulted others including family and friends until undergoing NIPT than their partners (89.1 vs. 54.6 %; p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that it is important to encourage male partners to be actively involved in the NIPT decision-making process. Differences between pregnant women and their partners should be seriously considered when providing genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Couples; Decision-making; Genetic counseling; NIPT; Partners; Pregnant women; Prenatal testing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27830353     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0038-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  27 in total

1.  Genetic counselors' experience with cell-free fetal DNA testing as a prenatal screening option for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Julie M H Horsting; Stephen R Dlouhy; Katelyn Hanson; Kimberly Quaid; Shaochun Bai; Karrie A Hines
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Women's knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping.

Authors:  M Cederholm; O Axelsson; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Amanda Buchanan; Amy Sachs; Tomi Toler; Judith Tsipis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland.

Authors:  Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer; Anjeung Kang Bellin; Sinuhe Hahn; Christian De Geyter; Johanna Buechel; Irene Hoesli; Olav Lapaire
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Patricia L Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K Brasington; Pamela Flodman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Non-specific psychological distress in women undergoing noninvasive prenatal testing because of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Takeshi Ebara; Kyoko Kumagai; Shinobu Goto; Yasuyuki Yamada; Michihiro Kamijima; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.

Authors:  Joanne B Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Cosmin Deciu; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow; Louis M Neveux; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk van den Boom; Allan T Bombard; Wayne W Grody; Stanley F Nelson; Jacob A Canick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Authors:  Wybo Dondorp; Guido de Wert; Yvonne Bombard; Diana W Bianchi; Carsten Bergmann; Pascal Borry; Lyn S Chitty; Florence Fellmann; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Lidewij Henneman; Heidi C Howard; Anneke Lucassen; Kelly Ormond; Borut Peterlin; Dragica Radojkovic; Wolf Rogowski; Maria Soller; Aad Tibben; Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Carla G van El; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.