Literature DB >> 24398792

Position statement on opportunistic genomic screening from the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (UK and Ireland).

Anna Middleton1, Chris Patch2, Jennifer Wiggins3, Kathy Barnes4, Gill Crawford5, Caroline Benjamin6, Anita Bruce7.   

Abstract

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics released recommendations for reporting incidental findings (IFs) in clinical exome and genome sequencing. These suggest 'opportunistic genomic screening' should be available to both adults and children each time a sequence is done and would be undertaken without seeking preferences from the patient first. Should opportunistic genomic screening be implemented in the United Kingdom, the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC), which represents British and Irish genetic counsellors and nurses, feels strongly that the following must be considered (see article for complete list): (1) Following appropriate genetic counselling, patients should be allowed to consent to or opt out of opportunistic genomic screening. (2) If true IFs are discovered the AGNC are guided by the report from the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics about the sharing of genetic testing results. (3) Children should not be routinely tested for adult-onset conditions. (4) The formation of a list of variants should involve a representative from the AGNC as well as a patient support group. (5) The variants should be for serious or life-threatening conditions for which there are treatments or preventative strategies available. (6) There needs to be robust evidence that the benefits of opportunistic screening outweigh the potential harms. (7) The clinical validity and utility of variants should be known. (8) There must be a quality assurance framework that operates to International standards for laboratory testing. (9) Psychosocial research is urgently needed in this area to understand the impact on patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24398792      PMCID: PMC4350604          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  1 in total

1.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

  1 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Familial/inherited cancer syndrome: a focus on the highly consanguineous Arab population.

Authors:  Fawz S AlHarthi; Alya Qari; Alaa Edress; Malak Abedalthagafi
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.617

2.  Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.

Authors:  Marlies Saelaert; Heidi Mertes; Elfride De Baere; Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Attitudes among South African university staff and students towards disclosing secondary genetic findings.

Authors:  Georgina Spies; Jolynne Mokaya; Jacqui Steadman; Nicole Schuitmaker; Martin Kidd; S M J Hemmings; Jonathan A Carr; Helena Kuivaniemi; Soraya Seedat
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Genome Sequencing Technologies and Nursing: What Are the Roles of Nurses and Nurse Scientists?

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Michelle L Wright; Kathleen T Hickey; David E Housman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Return of Results from Genomic Sequencing: A Policy Discussion of Secondary Findings for Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Kimberly J Johnson; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2014-09-01

7.  Incidental findings from clinical sequencing in Greece: reporting experts' attitudes.

Authors:  E G Gourna; N Armstrong; S E Wallace
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-07-22

8.  Associations between self-referral and health behavior responses to genetic risk information.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Sharon Lr Kardia; Colleen M McBride; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

Authors:  Anna Middleton; Katherine I Morley; Eugene Bragin; Helen V Firth; Matthew E Hurles; Caroline F Wright; Michael Parker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport.

Authors:  Nicole Vlahovich; Peter A Fricker; Matthew A Brown; David Hughes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.