Literature DB >> 12907101

Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.

Linda J Heffner1, Elena Elkin, Ruth C Fretts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of labor induction and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous and multiparous women between 36 and 42 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 14,409 women delivering at two teaching hospitals in metropolitan Boston during 1998 and 1999. Women who had contraindications to labor, including a prior cesarean delivery, were excluded. The risks for cesarean delivery by induction status, gestational age by completed week between 36 and 42 weeks, maternal age <35, 35-39, and >/=40 years, and stratified by parity, were calculated by logistic regression.
RESULTS: In nulliparas, labor induction was associated with an increase in cesarean delivery from 13.7% to 24.7% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48, 1.95]). In multiparas, induction was associated with an increase from 2.4% to 4.5% (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). Other variables that placed a nulliparous woman at increased risk for cesarean delivery included maternal age of at least 35 years and gestational ages over 40 weeks. For multiparas, only maternal age 40 years or older and gestational age of 41 weeks were associated with an increase in cesarean deliveries.
CONCLUSION: Induction of labor, older maternal age, and gestational age over 40 weeks each independently increase the risk for cesarean delivery in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Although the relative risk from induction is similar in nulliparas and multiparas, the absolute magnitude of the increase is much greater in nulliparas (11% versus 2.1%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907101     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00531-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  41 in total

1.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Impact of a Policy to Deliver at 39 Weeks for the Indication of Class III Obesity.

Authors:  Stephanie L Pierce; Marta E Maxted; Jennifer D Peck; Jessica S Lutz; Maria F Lopez-Davila; Frederico Vieira; Courtney B Atchley; Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 4.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

5.  Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  F Thangarajah; P Scheufen; V Kirn; P Mallmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Risk of cesarean section after induced versus spontaneous labor at term gestation.

Authors:  Hye Ran Lee; Mi-Na Kim; Ji Yeon You; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22

7.  Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.

Authors:  A M Faucett; K Daniels; H C Lee; Y Y El-Sayed; Y J Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Evaluation of risk factors in cesarean delivery among multiparous women with a history of vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Aysel Uysal Derbent; Aysun Karabulut; Melahat Yıldırım; Serap Aynur Simavlı; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  The active management of risk in multiparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey; Morghan H Stenson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa Kellar; Ian Bennett; Katie Margo; Joseph Stratton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Jill Milne; Amiram Gafni; Diane Lu; Stephen Wood; Reg Sauve; Sue Ross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.