Literature DB >> 10562751

Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

G Elwyn1, A Edwards, P Kinnersley.   

Abstract

The second half of the consultation is where decisions are made and future management agreed. We argue that this part of the clinical interaction has been 'neglected' during a time when communication skill development has been focused on uncovering and matching agendas. There are many factors, such as the increasing access to information and the emphasis on patient autonomy, which have led to the need to give more attention to both the skills and the information required to appropriately involve patients in the decision-making process. This analysis, based on a literature review, considers the concept of 'shared decision-making' and asks whether this approach is practical in the primary care setting. This study, and our ongoing research programme, indicates that future developments in this area depend on increasing the time available within consultations, require improved ways of communicating risk to patients, and an acquisition of new communication skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10562751      PMCID: PMC1313449     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  47 in total

1.  Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics.

Authors:  P Little; C Gould; I Williamson; G Warner; M Gantley; A L Kinmonth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-09

2.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  What clinical information do doctors need?

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-26

Review 4.  Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice.

Authors:  T E Quill; H Brody
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life.

Authors:  R L Street; B Voigt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Patient participation and decision control: are patient autonomy and well-being associated?

Authors:  H C de Haes; S Molenaar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter.

Authors:  D Lupton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Empowering the patient in the consultation: a pilot study.

Authors:  S McCann; J Weinman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1996-04

Review 9.  Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications.

Authors:  R B Haynes; K A McKibbon; R Kanani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Using interactive videos in general practice to inform patients about treatment choices: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Shepperd; A Coulter; A Farmer
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  149 in total

1.  What have we learnt from the Alder Hey affair? That monitoring physicians' performance is necessary to ensure good practice.

Authors:  H Bauchner; R Vinci
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

2.  Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling.

Authors:  G Elwyn; J Gray; A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Shared decision making in pediatrics.

Authors:  H Bauchner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

5.  Guided self management plans for asthma. Advice should be simple and patient focused.

Authors:  M Partridge; G Barnes; D Price; J Barnes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

Review 6.  Case report of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation.

Authors:  Shmuel Reis; Doron Hermoni; Pnina Livingstone; Jeffrey Borkan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

7.  Patient and provider perceptions of decision making about use of epidural analgesia during childbirth: a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Holly Bianca Goldberg; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

8.  Patients' views of the good doctor.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-28

9.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective.

Authors:  C Tarrant; T Stokes; A M Colman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.