Katy B Kozhimannil1, Ifeoma Muoto2, Blair G Darney3, Aaron B Caughey2, Jonathan M Snowden2. 1. Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: kbk@umn.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2011, Oregon implemented a policy that reduced the state's rate of early (before 39 weeks' gestation) elective (without medical need) births. OBJECTIVE: This analysis measured differential policy effects by race, examining whether Oregon's policy was associated with changes in non-Hispanic Black-White disparities in early elective cesarean and labor induction. METHODS: We used Oregon birth certificate data, defining prepolicy (2008-2010) and postpolicy (2012-2014) periods, including non-Hispanic Black and White women who gave birth during these periods (n = 121,272). We used longitudinal spline models to assess policy impacts by race and probability models to measure policy-associated changes in Black-White disparities. RESULTS: We found that the prepolicy Black-White differences in early elective cesarean (6.1% vs. 4.3%) were eliminated after policy implementation (2.8% vs. 2.5%); adjusted models show decreases in the odds of elective early cesarean among Black women after the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.00; p = .050) and among White women (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.93; p = .006). Adjusted probability models indicated that policy implementation resulted in a 1.75-percentage point narrowing (p = .011) in the Black-White disparity in early elective cesarean. Early elective induction also decreased, from 4.9% and 4.7% for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women to 3.8% and 2.5%, respectively; the policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in disparities. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide policy reduced racial disparities in early elective cesarean, but not early elective induction. Attention to differential policy effects by race may reveal changes in disparities, even when that is not the intended focus of the policy.
BACKGROUND: In 2011, Oregon implemented a policy that reduced the state's rate of early (before 39 weeks' gestation) elective (without medical need) births. OBJECTIVE: This analysis measured differential policy effects by race, examining whether Oregon's policy was associated with changes in non-Hispanic Black-White disparities in early elective cesarean and labor induction. METHODS: We used Oregon birth certificate data, defining prepolicy (2008-2010) and postpolicy (2012-2014) periods, including non-Hispanic Black and White women who gave birth during these periods (n = 121,272). We used longitudinal spline models to assess policy impacts by race and probability models to measure policy-associated changes in Black-White disparities. RESULTS: We found that the prepolicy Black-White differences in early elective cesarean (6.1% vs. 4.3%) were eliminated after policy implementation (2.8% vs. 2.5%); adjusted models show decreases in the odds of elective early cesarean among Black women after the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.00; p = .050) and among White women (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.93; p = .006). Adjusted probability models indicated that policy implementation resulted in a 1.75-percentage point narrowing (p = .011) in the Black-White disparity in early elective cesarean. Early elective induction also decreased, from 4.9% and 4.7% for non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women to 3.8% and 2.5%, respectively; the policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in disparities. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide policy reduced racial disparities in early elective cesarean, but not early elective induction. Attention to differential policy effects by race may reveal changes in disparities, even when that is not the intended focus of the policy.
Authors: William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter VanDorsten Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Edward F Donovan; Carole Lannon; Jennifer Bailit; Barbara Rose; Jay D Iams; Terri Byczkowski Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Samantha J Lain; Ruth M Hadfield; Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Jane B Ford; Nicole M Mealing; Charles S Algert; Christine L Roberts Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Tanjala S Purnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Sherita H Golden; Jacqueline R Halladay; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Bradley M Appelhans; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jonathan M Snowden; Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Brian Quigley; Mark W Tomlinson; Duncan Neilson; Steven A Friedman; Joanne Rogovoy; Aaron B Caughey Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan M Snowden; Sarah S Osmundson; Menolly Kaufman; Cori Blauer Peterson; Katy Backes Kozhimannil Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Samantha S Goldfarb; Kelsey Houser; Brittny A Wells; Joedrecka S Brown Speights; Les Beitsch; George Rust Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240