OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to conduct a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-resolution skull-bone imaging for dentistry and otolaryngology using different architectures of recent X-ray computed tomography systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) systems and one Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system were used in this study. All apparatuses were tested with installed acquisition modes and proprietary reconstruction software enabling high-resolution bone imaging. Quantitative analyses were performed with small fields of view with the preclinical vmCT phantom, which permits to measure spatial resolution, geometrical accuracy, linearity and homogeneity. Ten operators performed visual qualitative analyses on the vmCT phantom images, and on dry human skull images. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences between protocols in terms of linearity and geometric accuracy. All MSCT systems present a better homogeneity than the CBCT. Both quantitative and visual analyses demonstrate that CBCT acquisitions are not better than the collimated helical MSCT mode. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that current high-resolution MSCT protocols could exceed the performance of a previous generation CBCT system for spatial resolution and image homogeneity. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative evaluation is a prerequisite for comparison of imaging equipment. • Bone imaging quality could be objectively assessed with a phantom and dry skull. • The current MSCT shows better image quality than a dental CBCT system. • CBCT remains a work-in-progress technology.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to conduct a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-resolution skull-bone imaging for dentistry and otolaryngology using different architectures of recent X-ray computed tomography systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) systems and one Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system were used in this study. All apparatuses were tested with installed acquisition modes and proprietary reconstruction software enabling high-resolution bone imaging. Quantitative analyses were performed with small fields of view with the preclinical vmCT phantom, which permits to measure spatial resolution, geometrical accuracy, linearity and homogeneity. Ten operators performed visual qualitative analyses on the vmCT phantom images, and on dry human skull images. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences between protocols in terms of linearity and geometric accuracy. All MSCT systems present a better homogeneity than the CBCT. Both quantitative and visual analyses demonstrate that CBCT acquisitions are not better than the collimated helical MSCT mode. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that current high-resolution MSCT protocols could exceed the performance of a previous generation CBCT system for spatial resolution and image homogeneity. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative evaluation is a prerequisite for comparison of imaging equipment. • Bone imaging quality could be objectively assessed with a phantom and dry skull. • The current MSCT shows better image quality than a dental CBCT system. • CBCT remains a work-in-progress technology.
Authors: Louise Y Du; Joseph Umoh; Hristo N Nikolov; Steven I Pollmann; Ting-Yim Lee; David W Holdsworth Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: M Loubele; R Bogaerts; E Van Dijck; R Pauwels; S Vanheusden; P Suetens; G Marchal; G Sanderink; R Jacobs Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 3.528