Literature DB >> 25240897

Towards component-based validation of GATE: aspects of the coincidence processor.

Eder R Moraes1, Jonathan K Poon2, Karthikayan Balakrishnan3, Wenli Wang3, Ramsey D Badawi4.   

Abstract

GATE is public domain software widely used for Monte Carlo simulation in emission tomography. Validations of GATE have primarily been performed on a whole-system basis, leaving the possibility that errors in one sub-system may be offset by errors in others. We assess the accuracy of the GATE PET coincidence generation sub-system in isolation, focusing on the options most closely modeling the majority of commercially available scanners. Independent coincidence generators were coded by teams at Toshiba Medical Research Unit (TMRU) and UC Davis. A model similar to the Siemens mCT scanner was created in GATE. Annihilation photons interacting with the detectors were recorded. Coincidences were generated using GATE, TMRU and UC Davis code and results compared to "ground truth" obtained from the history of the photon interactions. GATE was tested twice, once with every qualified single event opening a time window and initiating a coincidence check (the "multiple window method"), and once where a time window is opened and a coincidence check initiated only by the first single event to occur after the end of the prior time window (the "single window method"). True, scattered and random coincidences were compared. Noise equivalent count rates were also computed and compared. The TMRU and UC Davis coincidence generators agree well with ground truth. With GATE, reasonable accuracy can be obtained if the single window method option is chosen and random coincidences are estimated without use of the delayed coincidence option. However in this GATE version, other parameter combinations can result in significant errors.
Copyright © 2014 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GATE; Monte Carlo methods; Nuclear medicine; Positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240897      PMCID: PMC4282824          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; M P Miller; D L Bailey; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Improving the singles rate method for modeling accidental coincidences in high-resolution PET.

Authors:  Josep F Oliver; Magdalena Rafecas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE.

Authors:  F Lamare; A Turzo; Y Bizais; C Cheze Le Rest; D Visvikis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Monte Carlo simulations of the count rate performance of a clinical whole-body MR/PET scanner.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Maria-Jose Martinez; Irene Torres; Ralf Ladebeck; Christian Michel; Stephan Nekolla; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Monte Carlo simulation of a GE eXplore VISTA system for quantitative small animal PET imaging.

Authors:  Ching-Ching Yang; Jianhua Yu; Jason J S Lee; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  Evaluation of static physics performance of the jPET-D4 by Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Hasegawa; Eiji Yoshida; Ayako Kobayashi; Kengo Shibuya; Fumihiko Nishikido; Tetsuya Kobayashi; Mikio Suga; Taiga Yamaya; Keishi Kitamura; Koichi Maruyama; Hideo Murayama
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Performance assessment of a software-based coincidence processor for the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monte Carlo simulation of digital photon counting PET.

Authors:  Julien Salvadori; Joey Labour; Freddy Odille; Pierre-Yves Marie; Jean-Noël Badel; Laëtitia Imbert; David Sarrut
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-04-25

3.  Validation of a computational chain from PET Monte Carlo simulations to reconstructed images.

Authors:  Philip Kalaitzidis; Johan Gustafsson; Cecilia Hindorf; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.