Literature DB >> 25237209

The Role of Only in Contrasts in and out of Context.

Katy Carlson1.   

Abstract

Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of "only" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle "only" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., "The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist") with "only" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase ("not the artist") than without it. The position of "only" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject "only" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when "only" marked the argument which answered the question, while "only" on the other argument slowed processing. Both "only" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25237209      PMCID: PMC4165549          DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Discourse Process        ISSN: 0163-853X


  8 in total

1.  The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures.

Authors:  K Carlson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Simon P Liversedge; Kevin B Paterson; Emma L Clayes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

3.  Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Stacy Birch; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

4.  Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: differential ERP effects.

Authors:  Britta Stolterfoht; Angela D Friederici; Kai Alter; Anita Steube
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-09-20

5.  Fill the gap! Combining pragmatic and prosodic information to make gapping easy.

Authors:  John C J Hoeks; Gisela Redeker; Petra Hendriks
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-05

6.  Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Michael Walsh Dickey; Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  S Birch; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

8.  Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge; Ruth Filik; Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in "let alone" ellipsis.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Predicting contrast in sentences with and without focus marking.

Authors:  Katy Carlson
Journal:  Lingua       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Structure Modulates Similarity-Based Interference in Sluicing: An Eye Tracking study.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.