Literature DB >> 16989798

Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: differential ERP effects.

Britta Stolterfoht1, Angela D Friederici, Kai Alter, Anita Steube.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have shown that focus structural representations influence syntactic processing during reading, while other studies have shown that implicit prosody plays an important role in the understanding of written language. Up until now, the relationship between these two processes has been mostly disregarded. The present study disentangles the roles of focus structure and accent placement in reading by reporting event-related brain potential (ERP) data on the processing of contrastive ellipses. The results reveal a positive-going waveform (350-1300 ms) that correlates with focus structural processing and a negativity (450-650 ms) interpreted as the correlate of implicit prosodic processing. The results suggest that the assignment of focus as well as accent placement are obligatory processes during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16989798     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  14 in total

1.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Michael Walsh Dickey; Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  The Role of Only in Contrasts in and out of Context.

Authors:  Katy Carlson
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2013

4.  Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Joseph C Tyler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in "let alone" ellipsis.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Bidirectional Relations between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective.

Authors:  Nathalie J Veenendaal; Margriet A Groen; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-08

7.  Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist.

Authors:  Jesse A Harris; Katy Carlson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Predicting contrast in sentences with and without focus marking.

Authors:  Katy Carlson
Journal:  Lingua       Date:  2014-10-01

9.  New is not always costly: evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese.

Authors:  Luming Wang; Petra B Schumacher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-28

10.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.