Literature DB >> 20852237

Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.

Stacy Birch1, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Three experiments explored whether patterns of eye movements during reading might help explain syntactic prominence effects that are typically observed using reaction time tasks. Participants read sentences in which target words were in syntactically prominent or syntactically less prominent positions. Across all three experiments, using three types of syntactic prominence manipulations, there were fewer fixations and shorter reading times for words in more prominent positions, indicating that enhanced accessibility of syntactically prominent words is not caused by increased processing time. Rather, syntactic prominence appears to facilitate early encoding/lexical access and sentence integration processes while also, as shown previously, increasing activation of concepts in a comprehender's sentence or discourse representation. We propose that enhanced encoding and sentence integration processes can be attributed to an increase in attentional resources for more prominent concepts, and that this increase derives from readers' immediate sensitivity to informational prominence contours that are signaled by syntax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20852237     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; Kristin M Weingartner; Alexandria E Guzmán; William H Levine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

2.  Linguistic focus and memory: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Peter Ward; Patrick Sturt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

3.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading.

Authors:  R K Morris; J R Folk
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

Review 5.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  S Birch; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

7.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.

Authors:  W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

9.  The interaction of subjectivization and concept placement in the processing of cleft sentences.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-11

10.  Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Simon P Liversedge; Ruth Filik; Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  10 in total

1.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Memory availability and referential access.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Peter C Gordon; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

3.  Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  The Role of Only in Contrasts in and out of Context.

Authors:  Katy Carlson
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2013

5.  Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Ashley Benatar; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Eye Movement Evidence for Hierarchy Effects on Memory Representation of Discourses.

Authors:  Yingying Wu; Xiaohong Yang; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.