Literature DB >> 9337583

Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.

S Birch1, K Rayner.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we explored how readers encode information that is linguistically focused. Subjects read sentences in which a word or phrase was focused by a syntactic manipulation (Experiment 1) or by a preceding context (Experiment 2) while their eye movements were monitored. Readers had longer reading times while reading a region of the sentence that was focused than when the same region was not focused. The results suggest that readers encode focused information more carefully, either upon first encountering it or during a second-pass reading of it. We conclude that the enhanced memory representations for focused information found in previous studies may be due in part to differences in reading patterns for focused information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337583     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.

Authors:  K Rayner; S Garrod; C A Perfetti
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-11

2.  The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses.

Authors:  D E BERLYNE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-03

3.  Cataphoric devices in spoken discourse.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; J D Jescheniak
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

5.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

Review 6.  Curiosity and exploration.

Authors:  D E Berlyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The interaction of subjectivization and concept placement in the processing of cleft sentences.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-11

8.  Intonational marking of given and new information: some consequences for comprehension.

Authors:  J K Bock; J R Mazzella
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01
  8 in total
  24 in total

1.  Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: an eye movement examination.

Authors:  Katherine S Binder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

2.  Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; Kristin M Weingartner; Alexandria E Guzmán; William H Levine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

3.  Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Stacy Birch; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

4.  Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick Sturt; Anthony J Sanford; Andrew Stewart; Eugene Dawydiak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Linguistic focus and memory: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Peter Ward; Patrick Sturt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

6.  Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Michael Walsh Dickey; Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences.

Authors:  Alison J S Sanford; Jessica Price; Anthony J Sanford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

8.  The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Hsuan-Chih Chen; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

9.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading.

Authors:  R K Morris; J R Folk
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

10.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.