Literature DB >> 25232162

Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types.

Alexander H Dalpke1, Marjeta Hofko2, Christian Stock3, Stefan Zimmermann2.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types. The 90% detection rates (95% confidence intervals) were 387 (97 to 1,551), 877 (238 to 3,230), 986 (183 to 5,287), 1,292 (328 to 5,078), 2,400 (426 to 13,518), and 5,848 (622 to 55,021) CFU/swab for Liquid Stuart, Liquid Amies, dry, Amies Gel without charcoal, ESwab collection, and Amies gel with charcoal swabs (Becton Dickinson), respectively. Amies Gel without charcoal, ESwab collection, and Amies gel with charcoal swabs had a tendency to be less sensitive, but none of the differences was statistically significant.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25232162      PMCID： PMC4313310          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.02306-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; D Stark; B Lockwood; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of three molecular assays for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Manuela Bento; Gesuele Renzi; Stephan Harbarth; Didier Pittet; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  Kenneth G Van Horn; Carol D Audette; Kelly A Tucker; Denise Sebeck
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care.

Authors:  R Cunningham; P Jenks; J Northwood; M Wallis; S Ferguson; S Hunt
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Quantitative analysis and molecular fingerprinting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in different patient populations: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  L A Mermel; S J Eells; M K Acharya; J M Cartony; D Dacus; S Fadem; E A Gay; S Gordon; J R Lonks; T M Perl; L K McDougal; J E McGowan; G Maxey; D Morse; F C Tenover
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Use of swabs without transport media for the Gen-Probe Group A Strep Direct Test.

Authors:  Paul P Bourbeau; Barbara J Heiter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Reduction in the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in surgical wards by rapid screening for colonization: a prospective, cross-over study.

Authors:  Katherine Hardy; Charlotte Price; Ala Szczepura; Savita Gossain; Ruth Davies; Nigel Stallard; Sahida Shabir; Claire McMurray; Andrew Bradbury; Peter M Hawkey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Use of CultureSwab Plus swabs with Amies gel agar for testing of naris specimens with the GeneOhm MRSA assay.

Authors:  P P Bourbeau; J A Riley; B C Shoemaker; K S Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Some are more equal--a comparative study on swab uptake and release of bacterial suspensions.

Authors:  Philipp Warnke; Liesa Warning; Andreas Podbielski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of Two PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD-Max MRSA XT.

Authors:  Margaux Lepainteur; Sandrine Delattre; Sophie Cozza; Christine Lawrence; Anne-Laure Roux; Martin Rottman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the BD Max StaphSR Assay for Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Positive Blood Culture Broths.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Fiona Hamilton; Laura Mackenzie; Stefan Zimmermann; Kate Templeton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT Assays Using ESwab-Collected Specimens.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Carly Kubasek; Faris Galambo; Elaine Vendrone; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.