Literature DB >> 17537949

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs.

S J van Hal1, D Stark, B Lockwood, D Marriott, J Harkness.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing problem. Rapid detection of MRSA-colonized patients has the potential to limit spread of the organism. We evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of MRSA detection by two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) and three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA), using 205 (101 nasal, 52 groin, and 52 axillary samples) samples from consecutive known MRSA-infected and/or -colonized patients. All detection methods had higher MRSA detection rates for nasal swabs than for axillary and groin swabs. Detection of MRSA by IDI-MRSA was the most sensitive method, independent of the site (94% for nasal samples, 80% for nonnasal samples, and 90% overall). The sensitivities of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay and the MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA agars with nasal swabs were 70%, 72%, 68%, and 75%, respectively. All detection methods had high specificities (95 to 99%), independent of the swab site. Extended incubation for a further 24 h with selective MRSA agars increased the detection of MRSA, with a corresponding decline in specificity secondary to a significant increase in false-positive results. There was a noticeable difference in test performance of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay in detection of MRSA (28/38 samples [74%]) compared with detection of nonmultiresistant MRSA (17/31 samples [55%]) (susceptible to two or more non-beta-lactam antibiotics). This was not observed with selective MRSA agar plates or IDI-MRSA. Although it is more expensive, in addition to rapid turnaround times of 2 to 4 h, IDI-MRSA offers greater detection of MRSA colonization, independent of the swab site, than do conventional selective agars and GenoType MRSA Direct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537949      PMCID: PMC1951204          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00139-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of CHROMagar MRSA medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bram Diederen; Inge van Duijn; Alex van Belkum; Piet Willemse; Peter van Keulen; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens by a nucleic acid-based hybridisation assay.

Authors:  M Holfelder; U Eigner; A-M Turnwald; W Witte; M Weizenegger; A Fahr
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, MRSA select, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lisa Louie; Deirdre Soares; Helen Meaney; Mary Vearncombe; Andrew E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  T Kim; P I Oh; A E Simor
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Sensitivity of surveillance cultures for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing-home-care unit.

Authors:  D L Sewell; S A Potter; C M Jacobson; L J Strausbaugh; T T Ward
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Genetic diversity among community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing outpatient infections in Australia.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Coombs; Graeme R Nimmo; Jan M Bell; Flavia Huygens; Frances G O'Brien; Mary J Malkowski; Julie C Pearson; Alex J Stephens; Philip M Giffard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Cassandra D Salgado; Barry M Farr; David P Calfee
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J A Jernigan; M G Titus; D H Gröschel; S Getchell-White; B M Farr
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  38 in total

1.  Alternative use for spectra MRSA chromogenic agar in detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Jess F Peterson; Alexander A Dionisio; Katherine M Riebe; Gerri S Hall; Deborah A Wilson; Susan Whittier; Joseph R Dipersio; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Authors:  Melvyn Howard Smith; Julian Hodgson; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Detection of group B streptococci in Lim broth by use of group B streptococcus peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization and selective and nonselective agars.

Authors:  Naomi S Montague; Timothy J Cleary; Octavio V Martinez; Gary W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Automation of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay for high-throughput screening of nasal swab specimens.

Authors:  Xue-Ping Wang; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in diverse clinical specimens by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay and comparison with culture.

Authors:  Katja Lucke; Michael Hombach; Melanie Hug; Gaby E Pfyffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  MRSA detection: comparison of two molecular methods (BD GeneOhm PCR assay and Easy-Plex) with two selective MRSA agars (MRSA-ID and Oxoid MRSA) for nasal swabs.

Authors:  S J van Hal; Z Jennings; D Stark; D Marriott; J Harkness
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.