Literature DB >> 19622077

Reduction in the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in surgical wards by rapid screening for colonization: a prospective, cross-over study.

Katherine Hardy1, Charlotte Price, Ala Szczepura, Savita Gossain, Ruth Davies, Nigel Stallard, Sahida Shabir, Claire McMurray, Andrew Bradbury, Peter M Hawkey.   

Abstract

Identification of patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and subsequent isolation and decolonization is pivotal to the control of cross infection in hospitals. The aim of this study was to establish if early identification of colonized patients using rapid methods alone reduces transmission. A prospective, cluster, two-period cross-over design was used. Seven surgical wards at a large hospital were allocated to two groups, and for the first 8 months four wards used rapid MRSA screening and three wards used a standard culture method. The groups were reversed for the second 8 months. Regardless of the method of detection, all patients were screened for nasal carriage on admission and then every 4 days. MRSA control measures remained constant. Results were analysed using a log linear Poisson regression model. A total of 12 682/13 952 patient ward episodes (PWE) were included in the study. Admission screening identified 453 (3.6%) MRSA-positive patient ward episodes, with a further 268 (2.2%) acquiring MRSA. After adjusting for other variables, rapid screening was shown to statistically reduce MRSA acquisition, with patients being 1.49 times (p 0.007) more likely to acquire MRSA in wards where they were screened using the culture method. Screening of surgical patients using rapid testing resulted in a statistically significant reduction in MRSA acquisition. This result was achieved in a routine surgical service with high bed occupancy and low availability of isolation rooms, making it applicable to the majority of health-care systems worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19622077     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02899.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Authors:  Melvyn Howard Smith; Julian Hodgson; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  To screen or not to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay for real-time PCR detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nasal specimens.

Authors:  Parul A Patel; Nathan A Ledeboer; Christine C Ginocchio; Susan Condon; Stephanie Bouchard; Peibing Qin; Tobi Karchmer; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Individualized antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections by gram-negative bacteria in instrumented spinal surgery.

Authors:  Susana Núñez-Pereira; F Pellisé; D Rodríguez-Pardo; C Pigrau; J M Sánchez; J Bagó; C Villanueva; E Cáceres
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of the BD Max methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay and the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay with direct- and enriched-culture techniques using clinical specimens for detection of MRSA.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Laboratory evaluation of the BD MAX MRSA assay.

Authors:  Raymond Widen; Vicki Healer; Suzane Silbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Christian Stock; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of ESwab with traditional swabs for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using two different walk-away commercial real-time PCR methods.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Carly Kubasek; Dominic Uy; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a duplex droplet digital PCR assay.

Authors:  Kashonda Kelley; Angela Cosman; Phillip Belgrader; Brenda Chapman; Donna C Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparative evaluation of two fully-automated real-time PCR methods for MRSA admission screening in a tertiary-care hospital.

Authors:  N J Hos; P Wiegel; J Fischer; G Plum
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.