Literature DB >> 26292311

Evaluation of the BD Max StaphSR Assay for Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Positive Blood Culture Broths.

Alexander H Dalpke1, Marjeta Hofko2, Fiona Hamilton3, Laura Mackenzie3, Stefan Zimmermann2, Kate Templeton3.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the BD Max StaphSR assay for the direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture medium. In a two-center trial, 155 blood cultures from the BD Bactec FX system and 212 from the bioMérieux BacT/Alert system were tested; 170 bottles yielded S. aureus, and all were identified correctly by the BD Max StaphSR assay. The assay required approximately 2.5 h, thus allowing rapid identification of blood cultures flagged positive.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26292311      PMCID： PMC4609707          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01922-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells.

Authors:  W A Al-Soud; P Rådström
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Impact of rapid in situ hybridization testing on coagulase-negative staphylococci positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Graeme N Forrest; Sanjay Mehta; Elizabeth Weekes; Durry P Lincalis; Jennifer K Johnson; Richard A Venezia
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Significantly improved performance of a multitarget assay over a commercial SCCmec-based assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening: applicability for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Ivan Brukner; Matthew Oughton; Anastasia Giannakakis; Ryan Kerzner; Andre Dascal
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  Impact of an evidence-based bundle intervention in the quality-of-care management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Luis E López-Cortés; Maria Dolores Del Toro; Juan Gálvez-Acebal; Elena Bereciartua-Bastarrica; María Carmen Fariñas; Mercedes Sanz-Franco; Clara Natera; Juan E Corzo; José Manuel Lomas; Juan Pasquau; Alfonso Del Arco; María Paz Martínez; Alberto Romero; Miguel A Muniain; Marina de Cueto; Alvaro Pascual; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Christian Stock; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.

Authors:  Greg S Martin; David M Mannino; Stephanie Eaton; Marc Moss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bacteremic pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus: A comparison of disease caused by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible organisms.

Authors:  C González; M Rubio; J Romero-Vivas; M González; J J Picazo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Comparison of the next-generation Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay and the GeneOhm StaphSR assay to routine culture for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in positive-blood-culture broths.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Stephen Allen; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erin McElvania TeKippe; Thomas Davis; Michael Levi; Donna Mayne; Preeti Pancholi; Ryan F Relich; Richard Thomson; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT Assays Using ESwab-Collected Specimens.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Carly Kubasek; Faris Galambo; Elaine Vendrone; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948
View more
  4 in total

1.  Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus Directly from Positive Blood Cultures by Use of the BD Max StaphSR Assay.

Authors:  Justin A Ellem; Tom Olma; Matthew V N O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of BD Max StaphSR for Screening of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates among a Contemporary and Diverse Collection from 146 Institutions Located in Nine U.S. Census Regions: Prevalence of mecA Dropout Mutants.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Amy A Watters; Paul R Rhomberg; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Jaewoong Lee; Yeon Joon Park; Dong Jin Park; Kang Gyun Park; Hae Kyung Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Rapid Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Atopic Dermatitis by Using the BD Max StaphSR Assay.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Lee; Kui Young Park; Taewon Jin; Ju Hee Kim; Seong Jun Seo
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.464
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.