Literature DB >> 26019193

Evaluation of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT Assays Using ESwab-Collected Specimens.

Suzane Silbert1, Carly Kubasek2, Faris Galambo2, Elaine Vendrone2, Raymond Widen2.   

Abstract

The BD Max MRSAXT and the BD Max StaphSR assays were validated for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ESwab samples. In addition, the BD Max StaphSR assay was evaluated for its ability to detect and differentiate S. aureus and MRSA in the same sample. A total of 255 ESwab samples collected from the anterior nares of patients were tested by each of three BD Max assays, including the BD Max MRSA first-generation assay. The results were compared to those of direct and enrichment culture. Additionally, a challenge panel comprising 14 control strains was evaluated to determine the ability of these assays to correctly identify MRSA and also appropriately differentiate S. aureus by the BD Max StaphSR assay. Out of 255 clinical samples tested, 161 were negative and 30 were positive for MRSA, and 45 were positive for S. aureus (by BD Max StaphSR) and negative for MRSA by all three PCR assays and culture. Nineteen samples had discrepant results; all of them were retested by additional laboratory testing. All strains from the challenge panel were correctly identified or excluded by the BD Max MRSAXT and BD Max StaphSR assays. The results showed that the BD Max StaphSR and the BD MRSAXT assays have excellent sensitivity (94.3%) and specificity (97.7%) for detecting MRSA. The BD Max StaphSR assay demonstrated excellent sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (93.6%) for detecting S. aureus.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26019193      PMCID: PMC4508447          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00970-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

Review 1.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  5 Million Lives Campaign. Case study: an MRSA intervention at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Donna M Hacek; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-12

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a neonatal intensive care unit by active surveillance and aggressive infection control measures.

Authors:  Jad Khoury; Marilyn Jones; Autumn Grim; Wm Michael Dunne; Vicky Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and prevention of nosocomial infections.

Authors:  J A J W Kluytmans; H F L Wertheim
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Impact of preoperative screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by real-time polymerase chain reaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  S Jog; R Cunningham; S Cooper; M Wallis; A Marchbank; P Vasco-Knight; P J Jenks
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection.

Authors:  Donna M Hacek; William J Robb; Suzanne M Paule; James C Kudrna; Van Paul Stamos; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals.

Authors:  Ari Robicsek; Jennifer L Beaumont; Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Peggy King; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Eili Klein; David L Smith; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BD Max StaphSR Assay for Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Positive Blood Culture Broths.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Fiona Hamilton; Laura Mackenzie; Stefan Zimmermann; Kate Templeton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Harboring mecC Still Eludes Us in East London, United Kingdom.

Authors:  H Ciesielczuk; M Xenophontos; J Lambourne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT for Screening of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates Collected from Hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Amy A Watters; Paul R Rhomberg; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.

Authors:  Melanie L Yarbrough; David K Warren; Karen Allen; Dennis Burkholder; Robert Daum; Curtis Donskey; Dennis Knaack; Anthony LaMarca; Larissa May; Loren G Miller; David M Parenti; Lance Peterson; Thean Yen Tan; Raymond Widen; Diana R Hernandez; Donna M Wolk; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of BD Max StaphSR for Screening of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates among a Contemporary and Diverse Collection from 146 Institutions Located in Nine U.S. Census Regions: Prevalence of mecA Dropout Mutants.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Amy A Watters; Paul R Rhomberg; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the BD Max StaphSR Assay for Detecting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) in ESwab-Collected Wound Samples.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Alicia Gostnell; Carly Kubasek; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Atopic Dermatitis by Using the BD Max StaphSR Assay.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Lee; Kui Young Park; Taewon Jin; Ju Hee Kim; Seong Jun Seo
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Comparison of ESwab and Wound Fiber Swab Specimen Collection Devices for Use with Xpert SA Nasal Complete Assay.

Authors:  Eric T Beck; Blake W Buchan; Garrett C Reymann; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.