Literature DB >> 23175236

[Assessment inventories for hearing aid outcome].

S Miller1, D Kühn, M Ptok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At the beginning of 2012 new fee schedule positions have been introduced to the ambulatory physician fee schedule ("Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab", EBM) regarding the hearing aid fittings of youngsters and adults. With regards to quality assurance the use of a hearing aid outcome self-assessment inventory is made compulsive. This article aims to review available hearing aid (self-) assessment inventories as well as the evaluations regarding criteria for test quality implemented.
METHOD: For this systematic review a selective literature research in PubMed has been carried out.
RESULTS: There are various self assessment inventories measuring hearing aid benefit. Many of the studies evaluating these inventories were implemented during the 1980ies and early 90ies when analogue hearing aids were commonly used. These results cannot automatically be transferred to the nowadays common digital devices. Only a small amount of studies investigated German translations of the mostly originally English inventories. DISCUSSION: In order to be able to identify the actual meaning of resulting values from these inventories, it is important for ENT doctors and audiologists to be well informed of the tests' quality criteria. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175236     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  7 in total

Review 1.  [How reliable are non-instrumental assessment tools for dysphagia?].

Authors:  S Miller; D Kühn; M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Everyday relevance of APHAB questions : Influence on answer frequency].

Authors:  S Storz; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Dependency of APHAB score in the ECu subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].

Authors:  J Löhler; O Wegner; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).

Authors:  Jan Löhler; F Gräbner; B Wollenberg; P Schlattmann; R Schönweiler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  [Possibilities to predict the success of an individual hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].

Authors:  Max Thomas; Rainer Schönweiler; Jan Löhler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.057

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.