Literature DB >> 25228629

The Vanderbilt holistic face processing test: a short and reliable measure of holistic face processing.

Jennifer J Richler1, R Jackie Floyd1, Isabel Gauthier1.   

Abstract

Efforts to understand individual differences in high-level vision necessitate the development of measures that have sufficient reliability, which is generally not a concern in group studies. Holistic processing is central to research on face recognition and, more recently, to the study of individual differences in this area. However, recent work has shown that the most popular measure of holistic processing, the composite task, has low reliability. This is particularly problematic for the recent surge in interest in studying individual differences in face recognition. Here, we developed and validated a new measure of holistic face processing specifically for use in individual-differences studies. It avoids some of the pitfalls of the standard composite design and capitalizes on the idea that trial variability allows for better traction on reliability. Across four experiments, we refine this test and demonstrate its reliability.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  face perception; face recognition; holistic processing; individual differences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228629      PMCID: PMC4528459          DOI: 10.1167/14.11.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  28 in total

1.  Where cognitive development and aging meet: face learning ability peaks after age 30.

Authors:  Laura T Germine; Bradley Duchaine; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.

Authors:  Brad Duchaine; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.

Authors:  Elinor McKone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Configurational information in face perception.

Authors:  A W Young; D Hellawell; D C Hay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants.

Authors:  Cindy M Bukach; Jasmine Cottle; JoAnna Ubiwa; Jessica Miller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-06

8.  Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability.

Authors:  Ruosi Wang; Jingguang Li; Huizhen Fang; Moqian Tian; Jia Liu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-05

9.  Holistic processing predicts face recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03-10

10.  Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.

Authors:  David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-06-19
View more
  15 in total

1.  About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jeremy Wilmer; Grit Herzmann; Rankin Williams McGugin; Daniel Fiset; Ana E Van Gulick; Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

4.  The constancy of the holistic processing of unfamiliar faces: Evidence from the study-test consistency effect and the within-person motion and viewpoint invariance.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Xinge Liu; Xinran Feng; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Gender differences in recognition of toy faces suggest a contribution of experience.

Authors:  Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Elizabeth A Nelson; Nicholas Watier; Denis Cousineau; Sébastien Béland; Charles A Collin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Holistic processing from learned attention to parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-03-16

8.  Face-Processing Differences Present in Grapheme-Color Synesthetes.

Authors:  Thea Mannix; Thomas Alrik Sørensen
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

9.  Validation of the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test.

Authors:  Chao-Chih Wang; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

10.  Attention Modification to Attenuate Facial Emotion Recognition Deficits in Children with Autism: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski; Susan W White
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.