Literature DB >> 22222218

Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability.

Ruosi Wang1, Jingguang Li, Huizhen Fang, Moqian Tian, Jia Liu.   

Abstract

Why do some people recognize faces easily and others frequently make mistakes in recognizing faces? Classic behavioral work has shown that faces are processed in a distinctive holistic manner that is unlike the processing of objects. In the study reported here, we investigated whether individual differences in holistic face processing have a significant influence on face recognition. We found that the magnitude of face-specific recognition accuracy correlated with the extent to which participants processed faces holistically, as indexed by the composite-face effect and the whole-part effect. This association is due to face-specific processing in particular, not to a more general aspect of cognitive processing, such as general intelligence or global attention. This finding provides constraints on computational models of face recognition and may elucidate mechanisms underlying cognitive disorders, such as prosopagnosia and autism, that are associated with deficits in face recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22222218     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611420575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  65 in total

1.  Looking like a criminal: stereotypical black facial features promote face source memory error.

Authors:  Heather M Kleider; Sarah E Cavrak; Leslie R Knuycky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Mother's but not father's education predicts general fluid intelligence in emerging adulthood: Behavioral and neuroanatomical evidence.

Authors:  Feng Kong; Zhencai Chen; Song Xue; Xu Wang; Jia Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Examining gray matter structures associated with individual differences in global life satisfaction in a large sample of young adults.

Authors:  Feng Kong; Ke Ding; Zetian Yang; Xiaobin Dang; Siyuan Hu; Yiying Song; Jia Liu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Neural decoding reveals impaired face configural processing in the right fusiform face area of individuals with developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jiedong Zhang; Jia Liu; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural evidence for the contribution of holistic processing but not attention allocation to the other-race effect on face memory.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Greta Minor; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The Vanderbilt holistic face processing test: a short and reliable measure of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing.

Authors:  David A Ross; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.