Literature DB >> 26500423

Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.

David A Ross1, Isabel Gauthier2.   

Abstract

Holistic processing is a hallmark of face processing. There is evidence that holistic processing is strongest for faces at identification distance, 2 - 10 meters from the observer. However, this evidence is based on tasks that have been little used in the literature and that are indirect measures of holistic processing. We use the composite task- a well validated and frequently used paradigm - to measure the effect of viewing distance on holistic processing. In line with previous work, we find a congruency x alignment effect that is strongest for faces that are close (2m equivalent distance) than for faces that are further away (24m equivalent distance). In contrast, the alignment effect for same trials, used by several authors to measure holistic processing, produced results that are difficult to interpret. We conclude that our results converge with previous findings providing more direct evidence for an effect of size on holistic processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete Design; Composite Task; Face Recognition; Holistic Processing

Year:  2015        PMID: 26500423      PMCID: PMC4613754          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1049678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  34 in total

1.  Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.

Authors:  Elinor McKone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; James W Tanaka; Danielle D Brown; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.

Authors:  Ciro Civile; Rossy P McLaren; Ian P L McLaren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Adriano Boremanse
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift from Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Yetta K Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-04-15

9.  Beliefs alter holistic face processing ... if response bias is not taken into account.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Holistic processing predicts face recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

2.  The Vanderbilt holistic face processing test: a short and reliable measure of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial features.

Authors:  Nazire Duran; Anthony P Atkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Contextual and own-age effects in age perception.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Hao Lou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.