Literature DB >> 27923772

Gender differences in recognition of toy faces suggest a contribution of experience.

Kaitlin F Ryan1, Isabel Gauthier2.   

Abstract

When there is a gender effect, women perform better then men in face recognition tasks. Prior work has not documented a male advantage on a face recognition task, suggesting that women may outperform men at face recognition generally either due to evolutionary reasons or the influence of social roles. Here, we question the idea that women excel at all face recognition and provide a proof of concept based on a face category for which men outperform women. We developed a test of face learning to measures individual differences with face categories for which men and women may differ in experience, using the faces of Barbie dolls and of Transformers. The results show a crossover interaction between subject gender and category, where men outperform women with Transformers' faces. We demonstrate that men can outperform women with some categories of faces, suggesting that explanations for a general face recognition advantage for women are in fact not needed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experience; Face recognition; Gender differences; Learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27923772      PMCID: PMC5376489          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

1.  The extreme male brain theory of autism.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.

Authors:  Hugh W Dennett; Elinor McKone; Raka Tavashmi; Ashleigh Hall; Madeleine Pidcock; Mark Edwards; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-06

3.  Measuring nonvisual knowledge about object categories: The Semantic Vanderbilt Expertise Test.

Authors:  Ana E Van Gulick; Rankin W McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

4.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.

Authors:  Brad Duchaine; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Other-race face perception.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; P C Jack; M A Christian
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1991-08

6.  Do People Have Insight Into Their Abilities? A Metasynthesis.

Authors:  Ethan Zell; Zlatan Krizan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03

7.  Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?

Authors:  Olivier Pascalis; Michelle de Haan; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Face gender modulates women's brain activity during face encoding.

Authors:  Johanna Lovén; Joakim Svärd; Natalie C Ebner; Agneta Herlitz; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  FACSHuman, a software program for creating experimental material by modeling 3D facial expressions.

Authors:  Michaël Gilbert; Samuel Demarchi; Isabel Urdapilleta
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  Individual differences in perceptual abilities in medical imaging: the Vanderbilt Chest Radiograph Test.

Authors:  Mackenzie A Sunday; Edwin Donnelly; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-09-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.