Literature DB >> 19022276

Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.

Elinor McKone1.   

Abstract

How does holistic/configural processing, a key property of face perception, vary with distance from an observed person? Two techniques measured holistic processing in isolation from part-based contributions to face perception: salience bias to upright in transparency displays, and a difficult-to-see Mooney face. Results revealed an asymmetric inverted-U-shaped tuning to simulated observer-target distance (stimulus size and viewer-screen distance combinations). Holistic processing peaked at distances functionally relevant for identification during approach (2-10m; equivalent head size=6-1.3 degrees ), fell off steeply at closer distances functionally relevant for understanding emotional nuances and speech (.25-2m), and operated over a very wide range of distances (from .46 to 23m, 47.5-0.6 degrees ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022276     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

Review 2.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The Vanderbilt holistic face processing test: a short and reliable measure of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Holistic face training enhances face processing in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Sarah Cohan; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Does temporal integration of face parts reflect holistic processing?

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Jennifer J Richler; W Stewart Phillips; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

6.  The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-07-23

7.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.

Authors:  David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-06-19

9.  Extensive childhood experience with Pokémon suggests eccentricity drives organization of visual cortex.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-06

10.  Neural representations that support invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.