Literature DB >> 26223027

About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Jennifer J Richler, R Jackie Floyd, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

Previous work found a small but significant relationship between holistic processing measured with the composite task and face recognition ability measured by the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT; Duchaine & Nakayama, 2006). Surprisingly, recent work using a different measure of holistic processing (Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test [VHPT-F]; Richler, Floyd, & Gauthier, 2014) and a larger sample found no evidence for such a relationship. In Experiment 1 we replicate this unexpected result, finding no relationship between holistic processing (VHPT-F) and face recognition ability (CFMT). A key difference between the VHPT-F and other holistic processing measures is that unique face parts are used on each trial in the VHPT-F, unlike in other tasks where a small set of face parts repeat across the experiment. In Experiment 2, we test the hypothesis that correlations between the CFMT and holistic processing tasks are driven by stimulus repetition that allows for learning during the composite task. Consistent with our predictions, CFMT performance was correlated with holistic processing in the composite task when a small set of face parts repeated over trials, but not when face parts did not repeat. A meta-analysis confirms that relationships between the CFMT and holistic processing depend on stimulus repetition. These results raise important questions about what is being measured by the CFMT, and challenge current assumptions about why faces are processed holistically.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223027      PMCID: PMC4581616          DOI: 10.1167/15.9.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  39 in total

1.  The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; M Styvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-03

2.  Interference and forgetting.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.

Authors:  Hugh W Dennett; Elinor McKone; Raka Tavashmi; Ashleigh Hall; Madeleine Pidcock; Mark Edwards; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-06

4.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Jennifer J Richler; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability.

Authors:  Hugh W Dennett; Elinor McKone; Mark Edwards; Tirta Susilo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-10-16

7.  Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Ana E Van Gulick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Individual differences in adaptive coding of face identity are linked to individual differences in face recognition ability.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Linda Jeffery; Libby Taylor; William G Hayward; Louise Ewing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A new selective developmental deficit: Impaired object recognition with normal face recognition.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Nathan Cashdollar; Emrah Düzel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability.

Authors:  Ruosi Wang; Jingguang Li; Huizhen Fang; Moqian Tian; Jia Liu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-05
View more
  8 in total

1.  Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Not so fast! Response times in the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test may not reflect face recognition ability.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Xian Li; Bar Yosef; Maruti V Mishra
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Early identity recognition of familiar faces is not dependent on holistic processing.

Authors:  Sarah Mohr; Anxu Wang; Andrew D Engell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Face-Processing Differences Present in Grapheme-Color Synesthetes.

Authors:  Thea Mannix; Thomas Alrik Sørensen
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

5.  Validation of the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test.

Authors:  Chao-Chih Wang; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

6.  On Response Bias in the Face Congruency Effect for Internal and External Features.

Authors:  Günter Meinhardt; Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Development of Holistic Face Processing From Childhood and Adolescence to Young Adulthood in Chinese Individuals.

Authors:  Yini Sun; Qinglan Li; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-09

8.  The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups.

Authors:  Hoo Keat Wong; Alejandro J Estudillo; Ian D Stephen; David R T Keeble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.