Literature DB >> 19304646

A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.

Hyejin Yang1, Xin Chen, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

We examined whether search is guided to novel distractors. In Experiment 1, subjects searched for a target among one new and a variable number of old distractors. Search displays in Experiment 2 consisted of an equal number of new, old, and familiar distractors (the latter repeated occasionally). We found that eye movements were preferentially directed to a new distractor on target-absent trials and that subjects tended to immediately fixate a new distractor after leaving the target on target-present trials. In both cases, first fixations on old distractors were consistently less frequent than could be explained by chance. We interpret these patterns as evidence for negative guidance: Subjects learn the visual features associated with the set of old distractors and then guide their search away from these features, ultimately resulting in the preferential fixation of novel distractors.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304646     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.3.554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Novelty enhances visual salience independently of reward in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Nicholas C Foley; David C Jangraw; Christopher Peck; Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neural evidence for distracter suppression during visual search in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Katharina N Seidl; Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Attention, learning, and the value of information.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Ecological Origins of Object Salience: Reward, Uncertainty, Aversiveness, and Novelty.

Authors:  Ali Ghazizadeh; Whitney Griggs; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Learning Where to Look for High Value Improves Decision Making Asymmetrically.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas; Joy Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-15

9.  Response of the Pre-Oriented Goal-Directed Attention to Usual and Unusual Distractors: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Golnaz Baghdadi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Reza Rostami; Mohsen Raza
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

10.  Value-based decision making via sequential sampling with hierarchical competition and attentional modulation.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.