Literature DB >> 25197454

Genome sequence and emended description of Leisingera nanhaiensis strain DSM 24252(T) isolated from marine sediment.

Sven Breider1, Hazuki Teshima2, Jörn Petersen3, Olga Chertkov2, Hajnalka Dalingault2, Amy Chen4, Amrita Pati5, Natalia Ivanova5, Alla Lapidus5, Lynne A Goodwin6, Patrick Chain2, John C Detter6, Manfred Rohde7, Brian J Tindall3, Nikos C Kyrpides5, Tanja Woyke5, Meinhard Simon1, Markus Göker3, Hans-Peter Klenk3, Thorsten Brinkhoff1.   

Abstract

Leisingera nanhaiensis DSM 24252(T) is a Gram-negative, motile, rod-shaped marine Alphaproteobacterium, isolated from sandy marine sediments. Here we present the non-contiguous genome sequence and annotation together with a summary of the organism's phenotypic features. The 4,948,550 bp long genome with its 4,832 protein-coding and 64 RNA genes consists of one chromosome and six extrachromosomal elements with lengths of 236 kb, 92 kb, 61 kb, 58 kb, 56 kb, and 35 kb, respectively. The analysis of the genome showed that DSM 24252(T) possesses all genes necessary for dissimilatory nitrite reduction, and the strain was shown to be facultatively anaerobic, a deviation from the original description that calls for an emendation of the species. Also present in the genome are genes coding for a putative prophage, for gene-transfer agents and for the utilization of methylated amines. Phylogenetic analysis and intergenomic distances indicate that L. nanhaiensis might not belong to the genus Leisingera.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marine; Rhodobacteraceae; Roseobacter clade; facultative anaerobe; methylated compounds; motile

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197454      PMCID: PMC4148953          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3828824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The genus was proposed by Schaefer et al. in 2002 [1] and belongs to the family within the class . The genus currently consists of three species with validly published names, with as the type species. The genus was named in honor of Thomas Leisinger on the occasion of his retirement and for his contributions to our understanding of the biochemistry of bacterial methyl-halide metabolism. NH52FT (= DSM 24252T = LMG 24841T = ATCC BAA-92T) is the type strain of and was isolated from marine sandy sediment taken from the South Chinese Sea [2]. The species name is referring to Nanhai, the Chinese name for the South China Sea. The other two species were isolated from seawater and a marine electroactive biofilm, respectively [1,3]. All three species are able to grow on methylated amines as the sole N source [4] and, at least for , the ability to grow on methyl halides as sole carbon source was described [1]. Here we present a summary classification and features of DSM 24252T, together with the description of the non-contiguous genomic sequence and annotation.

Classification and features

16S rDNA analysis

A representative genomic 16S rDNA sequence of DSM 24252T was compared with the Greengenes database for determining the weighted relative frequencies of taxa and (truncated) keywords as previously described [5]. The most frequently occurring genera were (51.0%), (20.2%), (7.6%), (5.5%) and (3.9%) (75 hits in total). Regarding the four hits to sequences from other species of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 96.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.4%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was (NR_025637), which corresponded to an identity of 96.8% and an HSP coverage of 100.1%. [Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.] The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AJ296158 (Greengenes short name 'Spain:Galicia isolate str. PP-154'), which showed an identity of 96.3% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples that yielded hits were 'microbi' (7.7%), 'marin' (7.3%), 'water' (7.0%), 'coastal' (6.6%) and 'effect' (6.6%) (168 hits in total). Environmental samples that yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found, indicating that this species is rarely detected in the environment. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of in a tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The sequences of the two identical 16S rDNA copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence (FJ232451).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and the neighboring genera , , and [1-3,6-16]. The tree was inferred from 1,385 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [5]. spp. were included in the dataset for use as outgroup taxa. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [5]. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [10,18-23].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and the neighboring genera , , and [1-3,6-16]. The tree was inferred from 1,385 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [5]. spp. were included in the dataset for use as outgroup taxa. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [5]. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [10,18-23]. Our phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1, Table 1) indicates that is not particularly closely affiliated with the other species. BLAST results against the NCBI database with the 1,429 bp long 16S rRNA gene sequence showed 97% similarity to strain MB2, DSM 17395 and 2.10 (see also the Greengenes analysis described above). Thus a reclassification of might be appropriate, but should probably be postponed until more genome sequences from the relevant genera are available, as the 16S rRNA gene trees are only partially resolved (Figure 1). A preliminary phylogenomic analysis is given below.
Table 1

Classification and general features of DSM 24252T according to the MIGS recommendations [24] published by the Genome Standards Consortium [25].

MIGS ID      Property      Term     Evidence code
      Domain Bacteria     TAS [26]
      Phylum Proteobacteria     TAS [27,28]
      Class Alphaproteobacteria     TAS [28,29]
      Current classification      Order Rhodobacterales     TAS [28,30]
      Family Rhodobacteraceae     TAS [28,31]
      Genus Leisingera     TAS [1,3,32]
      Species Leisingera nanhaiensis     TAS [2]
MIGS-7      Subspecific genetic lineage (strain)      NH52FT     TAS [2]
MIGS-12      Reference for biomaterial      Sun et al 2010.     TAS [2]
      Gram stain      Gram-negative     TAS [2]
      Cell shape      Rod-shaped     TAS [2]
      Motility      Yes     TAS [2]
      Sporulation      Not reported
MIGS-6.1      Temperature range      4-37 °C     TAS [2]
MIGS-6.1      Optimum temperature      25°C     TAS [2]
MIGS-6.3      Salinity      halophile     TAS [2]
MIGS-22      Relationship to oxygen      facultatively anaerobe     IDA
      Carbon source      complex substrates, betaine, methionine     TAS [2]
      Energy metabolism      Not reported
MIGS-6      Habitat      sea water, sediment, sand     TAS [2]
MIGS-6.2      pH      pH 6.0–9.3 (optimal, pH 7-8.5)     TAS [2]
MIGS-15      Biotic relationship      free living     TAS [2]
MIGS-14      Known pathogenicity      Not reported
MIGS-16      Specific host      Not reported
MIGS-18      Health status of host      Not reported
      Biosafety level      1     TAS [33]
MIGS-19      Trophic level      Not reported
MIGS-23      Isolation      sandy sediments     TAS [2]
MIGS-4      Geographic location      South China Sea     TAS [2]
MIGS-5      Time of sample collection      before 2009     NAS
MIGS-4.1      Latitude      15.55     TAS [2]
MIGS-4.2      Longitude      114.49     TAS [2]
MIGS-4.3      Depth      157 m     NAS
MIGS-4.4      Altitude      Not reported

Evidence codes – TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence); IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay. Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34].

Evidence codes – TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence); IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay. Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [34].

Morphology and physiology

NH52FT was originally described as an aerobe [2], but as genes for the dissimilatory reduction of nitrite could be found in the genome of DSM 24252T (see “Insights into the genome”) the organisms has the genetic potential to be a facultative anaerobe. Cells of strain NH52FT are Gram-negative, motile rods, 0.62 – 0.8 x 1.6 – 2.96 µm in size [2]. Figure 2 shows a scanning-electron micrograph of DSM 24252T. NaCl is essential for growth, which occurs from 0.6% to 6.0% NaCl with an optimum between 1% and 4% [2]. The temperature range is 4°C – 37°C (optimum 25°C) and the pH range is 6 – 9.3 (optimum 7 – 8.5). Growth only occurs on complex substrates such as yeast extract, tryptone and peptone from potatoes, as well as betaine and methionine [2]. The color of the colonies grown on complex medium (M2 agar medium) is beige. The type strain is susceptible to a broad spectrum of antibiotics listed in [2].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of DSM 24252T

Scanning electron micrograph of DSM 24252T

Chemotaxonomy

The main cellular fatty acids of strain NH52FT are (>1% of total fatty acids) C18:1 7c, an unknown fatty acid (eqivalent chain-length of 11.799), C16:0 2-OH, C10:0 3-OH, C16:0, 11-methyl C18:17c and C12:0 3-OH. The major polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, an unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified lipid and an aminolipid [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of the DOE Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing Program 2010, CSP 441: “Whole genome type strain sequences of the genera and – a monophyletic group of physiologically highly diverse organisms”. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [17] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state-of-the-art sequencing technology [35]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID      Property      Term
MIGS-31      Finishing quality      Non-contiguous finished
MIGS-28      Libraries used      Two Illumina paired-end libraries (270 bp and 8 kb insert size)
MIGS-29      Sequencing platforms      Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2      Sequencing coverage      711 × Illumina
MIGS-30      Assemblers      Allpaths version r39750, Velvet 1.1.05, phrap version SPS - 4.24
MIGS-32      Gene calling method      Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
      INSDC ID      AXBG00000000
      GenBank Date of Release      August 23, 2013
      GOLD ID      Gi10857
      NCBI project ID      78295
      Database: IMG      2512047087
MIGS-13      Source material identifier      DSM 24252

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A culture of DSM 24252T was grown in DSMZ medium 514 (Bacto Marine Broth) [36] at 28°C. gDNA was purified using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the directions provided by the supplier but modified by the use of a 40 min incubation time. The purity, quality and size of the bulk gDNA preparation were assessed by JGI according to DOE-JGI guidelines. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [37].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome sequence was generated using Illumina data [38]. For this genome, we constructed and sequenced an Illumina short-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 270 bp which generated 13,912,778 reads and an Illumina long-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 7,381 ± 2,326 bp which generated 9,786,858 reads totaling 3,555 Mbp of data (Feng Chen, unpublished data). All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI web site [39]. The initial draft assembly contained 43 contigs in 14 scaffolds. The initial draft data was assembled with Allpaths and the consensus was computationally shredded into 10 kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was also assembled with Velvet [40], and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was assembled again with Velvet using the shreds from the first Velvet assembly to guide the next assembly. The consensus from the second Velvet assembly was shredded into 1.5 kbp overlapping fake reads. The fake reads from the Allpaths [41] assembly and both Velvet assemblies and a subset of the Illumina CLIP paired-end reads were assembled using parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with manual editing in Consed [42-44]. Gap closure was accomplished using repeat resolution software (Wei Gu, unpublished data), and sequencing of bridging PCR fragments with Sanger technology. One round of manual/wet lab finishing was completed. A total of 43 additional sequencing reactions were completed to close gaps and to raise the quality of the final sequence. The estimated size of the genome is 5 Mb and the final assembly is based on 3,555 Mbp of Illumina draft data, which provides an average 711 × coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [45] as part of the JGI genome annotation pipeline [46], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [47]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene-prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [48].

Genome properties

The genome consists of seven scaffolds with a total length of 4,948,550 bp and a G+C content of 60.7% (Figures 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f and Figure 3g, Table 3). The scaffolds correspond to a chromosome 4,411,177 bp in length and six extrachromosomal elements. Of the 4,896 genes predicted, 4,832 were protein-coding genes and 64 RNAs. The majority of the protein-coding genes (81.1%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Figure 3a

Graphical map of the chromosome (cNanh_4411). From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3b

Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_A236. From bottom to top: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3c

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_B92. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3d

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_D58. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3e

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_F35. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3f

Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_E56. From left to right: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3g

Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_C61. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute      Number       % of Total
Genome size (bp)      4,948,550       100.00
DNA coding region (bp)      4,430,400       89.53
DNA G+C content (bp)      3,005,972       60.74
Number of replicons      7
Extrachromosomal elements      6
Total genes      4,896       100.00
RNA genes      64       1.31
rRNA operons      2
tRNA genes      49       1.00
Protein-coding genes      4,832       98.69
Pseudo genes      0       0.00
Genes with function prediction      3,970       81.09
Genes in paralog clusters      3,848       78.59
Genes assigned to COGs      3,813       77.88
Genes assigned Pfam domains      4,051       82.74
Genes with signal peptides      426       8.70
Genes with transmembrane helices      1,059       21.63
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code      Value       %age       Description
J      172       4.11       Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A      1       0.02       RNA processing and modification
K      299       7.14       Transcription
L      249       5.95       Replication, recombination and repair
B      4       0.10       Chromatin structure and dynamics
D      39       0.93       Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y      0       0       Nuclear structure
V      63       1.50       Defense mechanisms
T      113       2.70       Signal transduction mechanisms
M      199       4.75       Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N      33       0.79       Cell motility
Z      0       0       Cytoskeleton
W      0       0       Extracellular structures
U      77       1.84       Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O      147       3.51       Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C      288       6.88       Energy production and conversion
G      209       4.99       Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E      523       12.49       Amino acid transport and metabolism
F      88       2.10       Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H      167       3.99       Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I      247       5.9       Lipid transport and metabolism
P      217       5.18       Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q      159       3.8       Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R      509       12.16       General function prediction only
S      384       9.17       Function unknown
      1,083       22.12       Not in COGs
-      4,187       -       Total
Graphical map of the chromosome (cNanh_4411). From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_A236. From bottom to top: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_B92. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_D58. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_F35. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical map of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_E56. From left to right: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Graphical maps of the extrachromosomal element pNanh_C61. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insights into the genome

The replication-initiation systems identified on the scaffolds were as follows: cNanh_4411, dnaA, repB-I and rep ABC-2; pNanh_A236, repABC-5; pNanh_B92, dnaA-like and repA-d; pNanh_D58, repABC-9; pNanh_F35, repA-a; pNanha_E56, repA-b and repA-c; pNanh_C61, repA-I. This justifies the interpretation of cNanh_4411 as circular chromosome and of the other scaffolds as circular extrachromosomal elements [49,50]. Genome analysis of DSM 24252T also revealed the genes for the utilization of methylated amines (MAs). The key genes from the proposed pathway of MA metabolism code for the enzymes trimethylamine monooxygenase (tmm) and gammaglutamylmethylamide synthetase (gmaS). The trimethylamine monooxygenase is a flavin-dependent enzyme, recently identified by Chen et al. [51]. Comparison of a previously published sequence for a trimethylamine monooxygenase gene in DSM 24252T from Chen [4] (GenBank accession number JN797867) showed 99% sequence similarity to the gene of a predicted flavoprotein involved in K+ transport in the genome of DSM 24252T (Nanh_04177). Comparison of the gmaS sequence (JN797857) with the genome showed also a 99% sequence similarity to a glutamine synthetase, type III (IMG term: gamma-glutamylmethylamide synthetase, EC 6.3.4.12) (Nanh_04141). These genes give the potential to utilize MAs as alternative nitrogen sources [4]. Interestingly, the genes tmm and gmaS of DSM 24252T do not cluster with the corresponding genes of the other species in phylogenetic trees calculated for these genes. The Tmm sequence (~255 amino acids) clusters with and , the sequence for GmaS (~264 amino acids) with and AzwK-3b [4]. Strain DSM 24252T encodes a gene transfer agent (GTA), a virus-like particle that mediates transfer of genomic DNA between prokaryotes without negative effects on the host cell [52]. The GTA cluster has a length of ~17 kb (Nanh_00247-Nanh_00229) and shows structural similarities to GTAs of other species, e.g. 2.10 and DSM 17395 [53]. (Note that the species affiliation of and strains had recently been reassessed, resulting in the assignment of the alleged type-strain deposit DSM 17395 to [54].) Strain DSM 24252T also harbors a putative prophage (Nanh_4518 - Nanh_4531). We found all genes necessary for dissimilatory nitrite reduction, including the cluster for nitrite reductase (Nanh_03376 – Nanh_03386), the cluster for nitric oxide reductase (Nanh_03387 - Nanh_03394), and the cluster for nitrous oxide reductase (Nanh_01753 - Nanh_01761). was described as an aerobic bacterium, but only the reduction of nitrate was tested in the original description of this organism [2]. Based on the genomic information we tested strain DSM 24252T for dissimilatory reduction of nitrite, by using anaerobic marine basal medium according to Cypionka and Pfennig [55] supplemented with nitrite (5mM) and methionine (1mM). Reduction of nitrite was tested photometrically at 545nm after two weeks, using the Griess reaction [56]. The results showed that strain DSM 24252T is able to reduce nitrite under anoxic conditions, demonstrating that it is a facultatively anaerobic organism. Below we propose an according emendation of the species description. Interestingly, the same was found recently for T5T [21], which also was initially only tested for the reduction of nitrate and thus described as a strictly aerobic bacterium [32]. A test for nitrite reduction showed, however, that is in fact a facultatively anaerobic bacterium [21]. Based on these findings, we suggest that anaerobic growth of roseobacters should not only be tested with nitrate, but also with nitrite. As indicated by the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Figure 1), the classification of might need to be reconsidered. We conducted a preliminary phylogenomic analysis using GGDC [57-59] and the draft genomes of the type strains of the other and species. The results shown in Table 5 indicate that the DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) similarities calculated in silico of to species are, on average, not smaller than those to other species. The highest value was obtained for .
Table 5

DDH similarities between DSM 24252T and the other and species (with genome-sequenced type strains)†

Reference species      formula 1      formula 2      formula 3
L. aquamarina (AXBE00000000)      14.50±3.11      19.20±2.28      14.70±2.65
L. methylohalidivorans (CP006773, CP006774, CP006775)      14.50±3.11      19.20±2.29      14.60±2.64
P. arcticus (AXBF00000000)      14.60±3.12      22.90±2.37      14.80±2.66
P. caeruleus (AXBI00000000)      14.50±3.11      19.40±2.29      14.60±2.65
P. daeponensis (AXBD00000000)      14.70±3.13      19.60±2.30      14.80±2.66
P. gallaeciensis (AOQA01000000)      13.80±3.06      20.20±2.31      14.00±2.61
P. inhibens (AXBB00000000)      13.90±3.06      19.50±2.29      14.10±2.61

†Calculated in silico with the GGDC server version 2.0 [59]. The standard deviations indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size); see [59] for details. The distance formulas are explained in [57]. The numbers in parentheses are GenBank accession numbers identifying the underlying genome sequences. The accession number of is AXBG00000000.

†Calculated in silico with the GGDC server version 2.0 [59]. The standard deviations indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size); see [59] for details. The distance formulas are explained in [57]. The numbers in parentheses are GenBank accession numbers identifying the underlying genome sequences. The accession number of is AXBG00000000.

Plasmids

Genome sequencing of DSM 24252T reveals the presence of six plasmids with sizes between 35 kb and 236 kb (Table 6). The circular conformation of the chromosome and four extrachromosomal elements has been experimentally validated. The four larger plasmids contain characteristic replication modules of the RepABC-, DnaA-like and RepA-type comprising a replicase as well as the parAB partitioning operon [60]. The respective replicases that mediate the initiation of replication are designated according to the established plasmid classification scheme [61]. The different numbering of, e.g., the replicases RepC-5 and RepC-9 from RepABC-type plasmids corresponds to specific plasmid compatibility groups that are required for a stable coexistence of the replicons within the same cell [62]. The two small replicons pNanh_E56 and pNanh_F35 contain solitary RepA-IV type replicases without a partitioning module. This distribution may correspond with a higher plasmid copy number within the cell, thus assuring the replicon maintenance in the daughter cells after cell division. The additional RepA-IV type replicase that is located on the DnaA-like I plasmid pNanh_B92 may originate from a fusion event of two formerly independent plasmids.
Table 6

General genomic features of the chromosome and extrachromosomal replicons from strain DSM 24252T.*

Replicon     Scaffold     Replicase      Length (bp)      GC (%)     Topology      No. Genes#
Chromosome     1     DnaA      4,411,177      61     circular      4,358
pNanh_A236     2     RepC-5      236,302      61     linear*      236
pNanh_B92     3     DnaA-like I     RepA-IVc      92,007      58     circular      101
pNanh_C61     4     RepA-I      60,519      63     circular      58
pNanh_D58     5     RepC-9      57,777      60     circular      57
pNanh_E56     6     RepA-IVb      55,854      59     linear*      45
pNanh_F35     7     RepA-IVa      34,914      62     circular      41

*circularity not experimentally validated; #deduced from automatic annotation.

*circularity not experimentally validated; #deduced from automatic annotation. The locus tags of all replicases, plasmid stability modules and the large virB4 and virD4 genes of type IV secretion systems are presented in Table 7. The largest plasmid pNanh_A236 contains a post-segregational killing system (PSK), consisting of a typical operon with two small genes encoding a stable toxin and an unstable antitoxin [63]. Moreover, this RepABC-type plasmid also contains a complete type IV secretion system including the virB operon for the formation of a transmembrane channel. The relaxase VirD2, which is required for the strand-specific DNA nicking at the origin of transfer (oriT), and the coupling protein VirD4 support the presence of a functional conjugation system on this plasmid [64,65]. The presence of the highly conserved chromosomal genes virD2 (Nanh_3787) and virD4 (Nanh_3786), representing the relaxase and coupling protein, respectively, is noteworthy. However, the presence of two genes with an equivalent function on pNanh_F35 (Nanh_0082, Nanh_0080) is indicative for the mobilization of the smallest plasmid. The RepA-I type replicon pNanh_C61 contains a complete rhamnose operon [66] and it is dominated by genes that are required for polysaccharide biosynthesis. Finally, the presence of CRISPRs (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) that provide acquired resistance against viruses [67] on the 56 kb replicon pNanh_E56 is noticeable. The circularity of this scaffold has not been validated experimentally, but the proven circularity of the chromosome supports the localization of these CRISPRs on a plasmid.
Table 7

Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) locus tags of DSM 24252T genes†

RepliconReplication initiationPlasmid stability Type IV Secretion
     Replicase      Locus tag      Toxin      Antitoxin       VirB4      VirD4
Chromosome     DnaA      Nanh_3012      -      -       -      Nanh_3787#
pNanh_A236     RepC-5      Nanh_4695      Nanh_4700      Nanh_4699       Nanh_4884      Nanh_4897#
pNanh_B92     DnaA-like I     RepA-IVc*      Nanh_0132      Nanh_0112      -      -       -      -
pNanh_C61     RepA-I      Nanh_4577      -      -       -      -
pNanh_D58     RepC-9      Nanh_4622      -      -       -      -
pNanh_E56     RepA-IVb*      Nanh_0004      -      -       -      -
pNanh_F35     RepA-IVa*      Nanh_0078      -      -       -      Nanh_0080#

†Genes for the initiation of replication, toxin/antitoxin modules and two representatives of type IV secretion systems (T4SS) that are required for conjugation.

*solitary replicase without partitioning module

#presence of adjacent DNA relaxase VirD2

†Genes for the initiation of replication, toxin/antitoxin modules and two representatives of type IV secretion systems (T4SS) that are required for conjugation. *solitary replicase without partitioning module #presence of adjacent DNA relaxase VirD2

Emended description of DSM 24252T Sun et al. 2010

(nan.hai.en´sis. N.L. fem. adj. nanhaiensis referring to Nanhai, the Chinese name for the South China Sea, from where the type strain was isolated). The description is the same as given by Sun et al. [2] with the following modification: The relationship to oxygen of DSM 24252T is changed from aerobic to facultatively anaerobic.
  57 in total

1.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Leisingera nanhaiensis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment.

Authors:  Fengqin Sun; Baojiang Wang; Xiupian Liu; Qiliang Lai; Yaping Du; Guangyu Li; Jie Luo; Zongze Shao
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome sequence of Phaeobacter caeruleus type strain (DSM 24564(T)), a surface-associated member of the marine Roseobacter clade.

Authors:  Paul G Beyersmann; Olga Chertkov; Jörn Petersen; Anne Fiebig; Amy Chen; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Alla Lapidus; Lynne A Goodwin; Patrick Chain; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Meinhard Simon; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-07-30

5.  ALLPATHS: de novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreads.

Authors:  Jonathan Butler; Iain MacCallum; Michael Kleber; Ilya A Shlyakhter; Matthew K Belmonte; Eric S Lander; Chad Nusbaum; David B Jaffe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Seohaeicola saemankumensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Yoon; So-Jung Kang; Soo-Young Lee; Ki-Hoon Oh; Tae-Kwang Oh
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Leisingera aquimarina sp. nov., isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm, and emended descriptions of Leisingera methylohalidivorans Schaefer et al. 2002, Phaeobacter daeponensis Yoon et al. 2007 and Phaeobacter inhibens Martens et al. 2006.

Authors:  Ilse Vandecandelaere; Eveline Segaert; Alfonso Mollica; Marco Faimali; Peter Vandamme
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs.

Authors:  Alexander F Auch; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-01-28

9.  Complete genome sequence of the marine methyl-halide oxidizing Leisingera methylohalidivorans type strain (DSM 14336(T)), a representative of the Roseobacter clade.

Authors:  Nora Buddruhs; Olga Chertkov; Jörn Petersen; Anne Fiebig; Amy Chen; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Alla Lapidus; Lynne A Goodwin; Patrick Chain; John C Detter; Sabine Gronow; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Markus Göker; Thorsten Brinkhoff; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-10-04

10.  Genome sequence of Phaeobacter daeponensis type strain (DSM 23529(T)), a facultatively anaerobic bacterium isolated from marine sediment, and emendation of Phaeobacter daeponensis.

Authors:  Marco Dogs; Hazuki Teshima; Jörn Petersen; Anne Fiebig; Olga Chertkov; Hajnalka Dalingault; Amy Chen; Amrita Pati; Lynne A Goodwin; Patrick Chain; John C Detter; Natalia Ivanova; Alla Lapidus; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Meinhard Simon; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-10-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Genome-scale data suggest reclassifications in the Leisingera-Phaeobacter cluster including proposals for Sedimentitalea gen. nov. and Pseudophaeobacter gen. nov.

Authors:  Sven Breider; Carmen Scheuner; Peter Schumann; Anne Fiebig; Jörn Petersen; Silke Pradella; Hans-Peter Klenk; Thorsten Brinkhoff; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Complete Genome Sequence of Leisingera aquamixtae R2C4, Isolated from a Self-Regenerating Biocathode Consortium.

Authors:  Lina Bird; Brian J Eddie; Anthony P Malanoski; Princess Pinamang; Sarah M Glaven
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2019-09-05

3.  Genome sequence of Shimia str. SK013, a representative of the Roseobacter group isolated from marine sediment.

Authors:  Saranya Kanukollu; Sonja Voget; Marion Pohlner; Verona Vandieken; Jörn Petersen; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Nicole Shapiro; Markus Göker; Hans-Peter Klenk; Heribert Cypionka; Bert Engelen
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2016-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.